Sustained knowledge work and thinking time amongst academics: gender and working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 1.2 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
D. Peetz, M. Baird, Rupa Banerjee, Timothy J. Bartkiw, S. Campbell, S. Charlesworth, Amanda Coles, R. Cooper, Jason Foster, Natalie R Galea, Barbara de la Harpe, Catherine Leighton, B. Lynch, Kelly Pike, A. Pyman, I. Ramia, Susan Ressia, Mojan Naisani Samani, Kim Southey, G. Strachan, M. To, Carolyn Troup, S. Walsworth, S. Werth, Johanna Weststar
{"title":"Sustained knowledge work and thinking time amongst academics: gender and working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"D. Peetz, M. Baird, Rupa Banerjee, Timothy J. Bartkiw, S. Campbell, S. Charlesworth, Amanda Coles, R. Cooper, Jason Foster, Natalie R Galea, Barbara de la Harpe, Catherine Leighton, B. Lynch, Kelly Pike, A. Pyman, I. Ramia, Susan Ressia, Mojan Naisani Samani, Kim Southey, G. Strachan, M. To, Carolyn Troup, S. Walsworth, S. Werth, Johanna Weststar","doi":"10.1080/10301763.2022.2034092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The COVID-19 pandemic triggered a migration of workforces to work from home. A key issue for academics was the implications for the ability to carve out ‘thinking time’ to engage in what we term sustained knowledge work, the type of work essential for producing research. We administered an employee survey to academics from seven Australian and seven Canadian Universities, receiving over 3000 responses. We report on both quantitative and qualitative findings from the survey, with a particular emphasis on the latter. The two countries displayed broadly similar patterns in responses, but these patterns were gendered in specific ways. We distinguished between episodic and sustained knowledge work and found the shift of the location for sustained knowledge work from the workplace to the home affected academics unevenly, with disproportionate negative impacts on women. There are implications for all knowledge workers: while gendered, domestic norms continue to exist, the sustained knowledge work that is critical to career advancement can become especially problematic for women knowledge workers.","PeriodicalId":45265,"journal":{"name":"Labour & Industry-A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour & Industry-A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2022.2034092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

ABSTRACT The COVID-19 pandemic triggered a migration of workforces to work from home. A key issue for academics was the implications for the ability to carve out ‘thinking time’ to engage in what we term sustained knowledge work, the type of work essential for producing research. We administered an employee survey to academics from seven Australian and seven Canadian Universities, receiving over 3000 responses. We report on both quantitative and qualitative findings from the survey, with a particular emphasis on the latter. The two countries displayed broadly similar patterns in responses, but these patterns were gendered in specific ways. We distinguished between episodic and sustained knowledge work and found the shift of the location for sustained knowledge work from the workplace to the home affected academics unevenly, with disproportionate negative impacts on women. There are implications for all knowledge workers: while gendered, domestic norms continue to exist, the sustained knowledge work that is critical to career advancement can become especially problematic for women knowledge workers.
学者之间持续的知识工作和思考时间:COVID-19大流行期间的性别和在家工作
摘要新冠肺炎疫情引发了劳动力在家工作的迁移。学者们面临的一个关键问题是,是否有能力留出“思考时间”来从事我们所说的持续知识工作,这种工作对进行研究至关重要。我们对来自七所澳大利亚大学和七所加拿大大学的学者进行了一项员工调查,收到了3000多份回复。我们报告了调查的定量和定性结果,并特别强调了后者。这两个国家在回应中表现出大致相似的模式,但这些模式在特定方面是性别化的。我们区分了偶发性知识工作和持续性知识工作,发现持续知识工作的地点从工作场所转移到家庭对学术的影响不均衡,对女性的负面影响不成比例。这对所有知识工作者都有影响:尽管性别化的家庭规范仍然存在,但对职业发展至关重要的持续知识工作可能会对女性知识工作者造成特别大的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信