Steppingstones in larger struggles. How can we combine colliding struggles in the care crisis?

Bernadett Sebaly
{"title":"Steppingstones in larger struggles. How can we combine colliding struggles in the care crisis?","authors":"Bernadett Sebaly","doi":"10.18543/djhr.2693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of whether to increase the caregiver benefit is a controversial one among policy experts and movement actors. It is criticized as counterproductive to the emancipation of disabled people and women. At the same time, it becomes the goal of organizing campaigns as it provides immediate solutions, particularly to low-income families. This spotlights two questions: 1. How can activists fight for large-scale, transformative outcomes and achieve real, tangible changes in people’s lives? 2. How can a constituency fight for its liberation without leaving other constituencies behind? Drawing on the analysis of the Hungarian caregivers’ struggle, I reveal prospects for an emancipatory resolution of these two questions. I suggest seeing the struggles of affected constituencies as different dimensions of the care crisis and propose an organizing framework that engages with the deep structural underpinnings of capitalism and takes the issues of power and control inherent in care relations seriously. \nReceived: 05 July 2022Approval: 05 December 2022Published online: Articles in Press, February 2023","PeriodicalId":32727,"journal":{"name":"Deusto Journal of Human Rights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deusto Journal of Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18543/djhr.2693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question of whether to increase the caregiver benefit is a controversial one among policy experts and movement actors. It is criticized as counterproductive to the emancipation of disabled people and women. At the same time, it becomes the goal of organizing campaigns as it provides immediate solutions, particularly to low-income families. This spotlights two questions: 1. How can activists fight for large-scale, transformative outcomes and achieve real, tangible changes in people’s lives? 2. How can a constituency fight for its liberation without leaving other constituencies behind? Drawing on the analysis of the Hungarian caregivers’ struggle, I reveal prospects for an emancipatory resolution of these two questions. I suggest seeing the struggles of affected constituencies as different dimensions of the care crisis and propose an organizing framework that engages with the deep structural underpinnings of capitalism and takes the issues of power and control inherent in care relations seriously. Received: 05 July 2022Approval: 05 December 2022Published online: Articles in Press, February 2023
更大斗争中的垫脚石。在护理危机中,我们如何将相互冲突的斗争结合起来?
是否增加照顾者福利的问题在政策专家和运动参与者中是一个有争议的问题。它被批评为对残疾人和妇女的解放起反作用。与此同时,它成为组织运动的目标,因为它提供了即时的解决方案,特别是对低收入家庭。这突出了两个问题:1。活动家如何争取大规模的变革成果,并在人们的生活中实现真正的、切实的改变?2.一个选区如何在不把其他选区抛在后面的情况下争取解放?通过对匈牙利照顾者斗争的分析,我揭示了解放解决这两个问题的前景。我建议将受影响选民的斗争视为护理危机的不同层面,并提出一个与资本主义深层结构基础相结合的组织框架,认真对待护理关系中固有的权力和控制问题。接收日期:2022年7月5日批准日期:2022年底12月5日在线发布:2023年2月出版的文章
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信