Arminiani e sociniani nel Seicento: rifiuto o reinterpretazione del cristianesimo sacrificale?

Stefano Brogi
{"title":"Arminiani e sociniani nel Seicento: rifiuto o reinterpretazione del cristianesimo sacrificale?","authors":"Stefano Brogi","doi":"10.1515/qufiab-2022-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The terms „Socinian“ and „Arminian“ (despite their often equivocal and polyvalent use) refer primarily to the members of two small Christian communities viewed with great suspicion by the established churches: the Ecclesia minor of the Polish Brethren, on the one hand, and the Dutch Remonstrant Brotherhood, on the other. These were two numerically small and marginalized groups, but capable of influencing substantial numbers of theologians and intellectuals of different denominational backgrounds in many European countries. The Dutch Remonstrants faced frequent allegations of Socinianism: far from diminishing over time, these charges became harsher and more insistent after the destruction of the Ecclesia minor and the resulting Socinian diaspora. However, this study shows that the relationship was not one-way: Arminius’ heirs in turn influenced those of Sozzini, as evidenced by the development of the two theological traditions on the crucial issue of Christ’s redemption and atonement. At the end of the seventeenth century, on this as on other subjects, the theories of the Remonstrants established some hegemony over the doctrinal elaborations of the successors to the Socinian tradition.","PeriodicalId":82433,"journal":{"name":"Quellen und Forschungen aus italienischen Archiven und Bibliotheken","volume":"102 1","pages":"86 - 109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quellen und Forschungen aus italienischen Archiven und Bibliotheken","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/qufiab-2022-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The terms „Socinian“ and „Arminian“ (despite their often equivocal and polyvalent use) refer primarily to the members of two small Christian communities viewed with great suspicion by the established churches: the Ecclesia minor of the Polish Brethren, on the one hand, and the Dutch Remonstrant Brotherhood, on the other. These were two numerically small and marginalized groups, but capable of influencing substantial numbers of theologians and intellectuals of different denominational backgrounds in many European countries. The Dutch Remonstrants faced frequent allegations of Socinianism: far from diminishing over time, these charges became harsher and more insistent after the destruction of the Ecclesia minor and the resulting Socinian diaspora. However, this study shows that the relationship was not one-way: Arminius’ heirs in turn influenced those of Sozzini, as evidenced by the development of the two theological traditions on the crucial issue of Christ’s redemption and atonement. At the end of the seventeenth century, on this as on other subjects, the theories of the Remonstrants established some hegemony over the doctrinal elaborations of the successors to the Socinian tradition.
十七世纪的亚美尼亚人和社会人:对牺牲基督教的拒绝还是重新解释?
摘要“Socinian”和“Arminian”这两个术语(尽管它们经常模棱两可且多价使用)主要是指两个小基督教社区的成员,这两个社区受到了老牌教会的极大怀疑:一方面是波兰兄弟会的小传道会,另一方面是荷兰抗议兄弟会。这是两个数量较小且被边缘化的群体,但能够影响许多欧洲国家大量不同教派背景的神学家和知识分子。荷兰抗议者经常面临社会主义的指控:这些指控非但没有随着时间的推移而减少,反而在未成年教会和由此产生的社会散居者被摧毁后变得更加严厉和坚持。然而,这项研究表明,这种关系并不是单向的:阿米纽斯的继承人反过来影响了索齐尼的继承人,这两种神学传统在基督救赎和赎罪这一关键问题上的发展就是明证。在17世纪末,在这一问题上,正如在其他问题上一样,谏议家的理论建立了对社会传统继承者的理论阐述的某种霸权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书