“Playing in the Big Leagues Now”: Exploring Feedback Receptivity During the Transition to Residency

Q1 Nursing
Élisabeth Boileau , Marjolaine Talbot-Lemaire , Mathieu Bélanger , Christina St-Onge
{"title":"“Playing in the Big Leagues Now”: Exploring Feedback Receptivity During the Transition to Residency","authors":"Élisabeth Boileau ,&nbsp;Marjolaine Talbot-Lemaire ,&nbsp;Mathieu Bélanger ,&nbsp;Christina St-Onge","doi":"10.1016/j.hpe.2018.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Learners’ perceptions of feedback can significantly undermine its impact. Consequently, some feedback has been known to fall on deaf ears. At times when stress is heightened, however, feedback may hold value for both learning purposes and reassurance. Because stress and uncertainty are intensified during the steep transition from medical school to residency, we aimed to explore new residents’ receptivity to feedback and the characteristics of feedback that could optimise it at this stage in their training.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Nine residents who were two to three months along in a residency program were recruited through voluntary sampling, then met individually for a semi-structured interview. Qualitative analysis of these interviews was conducted to explore new residents’ perception of their new context and their experiences with feedback, using a constructivist approach. Emerging themes and categories were developed inductively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Insights gained from our participants’ perspectives suggest that common circumstantial factors prompt novice residents to seek more guidance through feedback. In this study, novice residents were most receptive to feedback when its content was practical and aligned with residents’ personal objectives, when it was coherent with previous feedback and when it was discussed one-on-one in a setting which the resident considered safe. Participants expressed a need for more feedback on specific topics such as medical knowledge, clinical reasoning, prescribing, prioritizing, managing critically ill patients and dealing with increased anxiety.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Medical teachers should be mindful of learners’ increased anxiety and uncertainty during the transition from medical school to postgraduate training, because more guidance may be needed during this period, including through feedback. Future research is needed to determine how this teaching momentum can best be utilized.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93562,"journal":{"name":"Health professions education","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 303-312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hpe.2018.09.003","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health professions education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452301118301287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction

Learners’ perceptions of feedback can significantly undermine its impact. Consequently, some feedback has been known to fall on deaf ears. At times when stress is heightened, however, feedback may hold value for both learning purposes and reassurance. Because stress and uncertainty are intensified during the steep transition from medical school to residency, we aimed to explore new residents’ receptivity to feedback and the characteristics of feedback that could optimise it at this stage in their training.

Material and methods

Nine residents who were two to three months along in a residency program were recruited through voluntary sampling, then met individually for a semi-structured interview. Qualitative analysis of these interviews was conducted to explore new residents’ perception of their new context and their experiences with feedback, using a constructivist approach. Emerging themes and categories were developed inductively.

Results

Insights gained from our participants’ perspectives suggest that common circumstantial factors prompt novice residents to seek more guidance through feedback. In this study, novice residents were most receptive to feedback when its content was practical and aligned with residents’ personal objectives, when it was coherent with previous feedback and when it was discussed one-on-one in a setting which the resident considered safe. Participants expressed a need for more feedback on specific topics such as medical knowledge, clinical reasoning, prescribing, prioritizing, managing critically ill patients and dealing with increased anxiety.

Conclusion

Medical teachers should be mindful of learners’ increased anxiety and uncertainty during the transition from medical school to postgraduate training, because more guidance may be needed during this period, including through feedback. Future research is needed to determine how this teaching momentum can best be utilized.

“现在在大联盟中打球”:探索在过渡到住院医师期间的反馈接受性
学习者对反馈的看法会大大削弱反馈的影响。因此,一些反馈被置若罔闻。然而,在压力加剧的时候,反馈可能对学习和安慰都有价值。由于压力和不确定性在从医学院到住院医师的陡峭过渡期间加剧,我们旨在探索新住院医生对反馈的接受程度以及反馈的特征,从而在他们的培训阶段优化反馈。材料和方法通过自愿抽样的方式招募了参加住院医师项目两到三个月的9名住院医师,然后分别进行了半结构化的访谈。采用建构主义的方法,对这些访谈进行定性分析,以探索新居民对新环境的感知和反馈体验。新兴主题和类别归纳发展。结果从参与者的角度观察到,共同的环境因素促使新手居民通过反馈寻求更多的指导。在这项研究中,当反馈的内容是实际的,与居民的个人目标一致时,当它与以前的反馈一致时,当它在一个居民认为安全的环境中进行一对一的讨论时,新手住院医生最容易接受反馈。与会者表示,需要就医学知识、临床推理、开处方、确定优先次序、管理危重病人和处理日益加剧的焦虑等具体问题获得更多反馈。结论医学教师应注意学生在从医学院过渡到研究生阶段的焦虑和不确定性增加,因为这一阶段可能需要更多的指导,包括通过反馈。未来的研究需要确定如何最好地利用这种教学势头。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信