The hidden curriculum across medical disciplines: an examination of scope, impact, and context.

Canadian medical education journal Pub Date : 2024-02-29 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.36834/cmej.75207
Karen Schultz, Nicholas Cofie, Heather Braund, Mala Joneja, Shayna Watson, John Drover, Laura MacMillan-Jones, Nancy Dalgarno
{"title":"The hidden curriculum across medical disciplines: an examination of scope, impact, and context.","authors":"Karen Schultz, Nicholas Cofie, Heather Braund, Mala Joneja, Shayna Watson, John Drover, Laura MacMillan-Jones, Nancy Dalgarno","doi":"10.36834/cmej.75207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While research suggests that manifestations of the hidden curriculum (HC) phenomenon have the potential to reinforce or undermine the values of an institution, very few studies have comprehensively measured its scope, impact, and the varied clinical teaching and learning contexts within which they occur. We explored the HC and examined the validity of newly developed constructs and determined the influence of context on the HC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed medical students (<i>n</i> =182), residents (<i>n</i> =148), and faculty (<i>n</i> = 140) from all disciplines at our institution between 2019 and 2020. Based on prior research and expertise, we measured participants' experience with the HC including perceptions of respect and disrespect for different medical disciplines, settings in which the HC is experienced, impact of the HC, personal actions, efficacy, and their institutional perceptions. We examined the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the HC constructs using exploratory factor analysis Cronbach's alpha, regression analysis and Pearson's correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Expert judges (physician faculty and medical learners) confirmed the content validity of the items used and the analysis revealed new HC constructs reflecting <i>negative expressions, positive impacts and expressions, negative impacts, personal actions</i>, and <i>positive institutional perceptions of the HC</i>. Evidence for criterion validity was found for <i>the negative impacts</i> and the <i>personal actions</i> constructs and were significantly associated with the stage of respondents' career and gender. Support for convergent validity was obtained for HC constructs that were significantly correlated with certain contexts within which the HC occurs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More unique dimensions and contexts of the HC exist than have been previously documented. The findings demonstrate that specific clinical contexts can be targeted to improve negative expressions and impacts of the HC.</p>","PeriodicalId":72503,"journal":{"name":"Canadian medical education journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10961118/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian medical education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.75207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While research suggests that manifestations of the hidden curriculum (HC) phenomenon have the potential to reinforce or undermine the values of an institution, very few studies have comprehensively measured its scope, impact, and the varied clinical teaching and learning contexts within which they occur. We explored the HC and examined the validity of newly developed constructs and determined the influence of context on the HC.

Methods: We surveyed medical students (n =182), residents (n =148), and faculty (n = 140) from all disciplines at our institution between 2019 and 2020. Based on prior research and expertise, we measured participants' experience with the HC including perceptions of respect and disrespect for different medical disciplines, settings in which the HC is experienced, impact of the HC, personal actions, efficacy, and their institutional perceptions. We examined the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the HC constructs using exploratory factor analysis Cronbach's alpha, regression analysis and Pearson's correlations.

Results: Expert judges (physician faculty and medical learners) confirmed the content validity of the items used and the analysis revealed new HC constructs reflecting negative expressions, positive impacts and expressions, negative impacts, personal actions, and positive institutional perceptions of the HC. Evidence for criterion validity was found for the negative impacts and the personal actions constructs and were significantly associated with the stage of respondents' career and gender. Support for convergent validity was obtained for HC constructs that were significantly correlated with certain contexts within which the HC occurs.

Conclusion: More unique dimensions and contexts of the HC exist than have been previously documented. The findings demonstrate that specific clinical contexts can be targeted to improve negative expressions and impacts of the HC.

跨医学学科的隐性课程:范围、影响和背景的考察
背景:虽然研究表明,隐性课程(HC)现象的表现有可能加强或破坏一个机构的价值观,但很少有研究全面衡量其范围、影响以及发生这些现象的各种临床教学和学习环境。本研究探讨了构念对构念的影响,考察了新构念的效度,并确定了语境对构念的影响。方法:我们在2019年至2020年期间对我院所有学科的医学生(n =182)、住院医生(n =148)和教师(n = 140)进行了调查。基于先前的研究和专业知识,我们测量了参与者对HC的体验,包括对不同医学学科的尊重和不尊重的感知,经历HC的环境,HC的影响,个人行为,功效和他们的机构感知。我们使用探索性因子分析Cronbach’s alpha、回归分析和Pearson’s相关检验了HC结构的因子结构、信度和效度。结果:专家评委(医师教师和医学学习者)确认了所使用项目的内容效度,分析揭示了新的HC构念,反映了HC的消极表达、积极影响和表达、消极影响、个人行为和积极的制度观念。负面影响和个人行为构念均存在效度证据,且与被调查者的职业阶段和性别显著相关。支持收敛效度的HC构念与HC发生的特定语境显著相关。结论:更多独特的维度和背景的HC存在比以前的文献。研究结果表明,特定的临床环境可以有针对性地改善HC的阴性表达和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信