The role of immunotherapy in metastatic triple negative breast cancer: a narrative review of the current clinical trials

Kim Koczka, N. Nixon
{"title":"The role of immunotherapy in metastatic triple negative breast cancer: a narrative review of the current clinical trials","authors":"Kim Koczka, N. Nixon","doi":"10.21037/PCM-20-58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Triple negative breast cancer is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer that lacks expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors, and does not overexpress the human epithelial growth factor 2 receptor. Triple negative breast cancer occurs in approximately 20% of breast cancer cases, and patients are more likely to present with an advanced stage, have higher relapse rates, and have a worse prognosis than other breast cancer types. There are no targeted therapies for the majority of patients with triple negative breast cancer. The mainstay of treatment remains chemotherapy and the historical median overall survival for metastatic patients is around one year. Immunotherapy has dramatically improved outcomes in other malignancies by harnessing the body’s immune system to attack cancer cells. Triple negative breast cancer is the most immunogenic type of breast cancer, with a large genetic mutational burden and a relatively high number of immune cells found in the cancer microenvironment compared to other breast cancer subtypes. While initial studies of single agent immunotherapy in metastatic triple negative breast cancer were promising, the survival outcomes have been disappointing. Combining systemic therapy with immunotherapy has become a recent focus of clinical trials, and is now the current standard of care for treatment naive metastatic triple negative patients that are programmed death-ligand 1 positive. The efficacy of combined chemoimmunotherapy for first-line treatment has yet to be replicated, and recent clinical data questions the true benefit. This review summarizes the clinical trials of single agent and combination strategies for immunotherapy in metastatic triple negative breast cancer. We also examine the potential role for biomarkers, and future direction of treatment.","PeriodicalId":74487,"journal":{"name":"Precision cancer medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision cancer medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/PCM-20-58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Triple negative breast cancer is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer that lacks expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors, and does not overexpress the human epithelial growth factor 2 receptor. Triple negative breast cancer occurs in approximately 20% of breast cancer cases, and patients are more likely to present with an advanced stage, have higher relapse rates, and have a worse prognosis than other breast cancer types. There are no targeted therapies for the majority of patients with triple negative breast cancer. The mainstay of treatment remains chemotherapy and the historical median overall survival for metastatic patients is around one year. Immunotherapy has dramatically improved outcomes in other malignancies by harnessing the body’s immune system to attack cancer cells. Triple negative breast cancer is the most immunogenic type of breast cancer, with a large genetic mutational burden and a relatively high number of immune cells found in the cancer microenvironment compared to other breast cancer subtypes. While initial studies of single agent immunotherapy in metastatic triple negative breast cancer were promising, the survival outcomes have been disappointing. Combining systemic therapy with immunotherapy has become a recent focus of clinical trials, and is now the current standard of care for treatment naive metastatic triple negative patients that are programmed death-ligand 1 positive. The efficacy of combined chemoimmunotherapy for first-line treatment has yet to be replicated, and recent clinical data questions the true benefit. This review summarizes the clinical trials of single agent and combination strategies for immunotherapy in metastatic triple negative breast cancer. We also examine the potential role for biomarkers, and future direction of treatment.
免疫治疗在转移性三阴性乳腺癌中的作用:当前临床试验的叙述性回顾
三阴性乳腺癌癌症是癌症的一种侵袭性亚型,缺乏雌激素和孕酮受体的表达,并且不过度表达人上皮生长因子2受体。癌症三阴性发生在约20%的癌症病例中,与其他癌症类型相比,患者更可能出现晚期,复发率更高,预后更差。目前还没有针对大多数癌症三阴性患者的靶向治疗。主要的治疗方法仍然是化疗,转移患者的历史中位总生存期约为一年。免疫疗法通过利用人体免疫系统攻击癌症细胞,显著改善了其他恶性肿瘤的治疗效果。三阴性乳腺癌癌症是最具免疫原性的癌症类型,与其他癌症亚型相比,在癌症微环境中发现的遗传突变负担大,免疫细胞数量相对较高。虽然单剂免疫治疗转移性三阴性乳腺癌症的初步研究很有希望,但生存结果令人失望。将系统治疗与免疫疗法相结合已成为最近临床试验的焦点,并且现在是治疗程序性死亡配体1阳性的幼稚转移性三阴性患者的当前护理标准。联合化学免疫疗法用于一线治疗的疗效尚待复制,最近的临床数据对其真正的益处提出了质疑。本文综述了单药联合免疫治疗转移性三阴性乳腺癌症的临床试验。我们还研究了生物标志物的潜在作用,以及未来的治疗方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信