Development and Implementation of a Function-Based Clinical Interview to Evaluate Childhood Behavior Problems

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Matthew L. Edelstein, Amanda Moen, Jaime L. Benson, Renee Smucker, Susan Perkins-Parks
{"title":"Development and Implementation of a Function-Based Clinical Interview to Evaluate Childhood Behavior Problems","authors":"Matthew L. Edelstein,&nbsp;Amanda Moen,&nbsp;Jaime L. Benson,&nbsp;Renee Smucker,&nbsp;Susan Perkins-Parks","doi":"10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The most common reason that children are referred to mental health providers relates to behavior and emotional problems. Without intervention, children with maladaptive behaviors are at risk for poor school performance, interpersonal difficulties, and significant conduct problems later in life. Previous research on the assessment of these problems has focused primarily on caregiver self-report questionnaires, observational coding, and/or diagnostic classification. The behavior literature has far fewer examples of best-practice interview strategies to solicit meaningful clinical information from primary stakeholders. Since caregiver report is essential during initial interviews to better understand his or her child’s presenting issues and given the primary role of assessment is to integrate information into the design of an evidence-based intervention (Barlow et al., 2005), additional published guidance on the content of these clinical interactions is warranted. The following paper outlines an approach to gathering pertinent information from caregivers about their children’s behavior in a way that is germane to treatment planning. In addition, the authors include validity and reliability data to substantiate the interview’s continued use in the clinical setting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51511,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice","volume":"30 3","pages":"Pages 421-435"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077722922000268","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The most common reason that children are referred to mental health providers relates to behavior and emotional problems. Without intervention, children with maladaptive behaviors are at risk for poor school performance, interpersonal difficulties, and significant conduct problems later in life. Previous research on the assessment of these problems has focused primarily on caregiver self-report questionnaires, observational coding, and/or diagnostic classification. The behavior literature has far fewer examples of best-practice interview strategies to solicit meaningful clinical information from primary stakeholders. Since caregiver report is essential during initial interviews to better understand his or her child’s presenting issues and given the primary role of assessment is to integrate information into the design of an evidence-based intervention (Barlow et al., 2005), additional published guidance on the content of these clinical interactions is warranted. The following paper outlines an approach to gathering pertinent information from caregivers about their children’s behavior in a way that is germane to treatment planning. In addition, the authors include validity and reliability data to substantiate the interview’s continued use in the clinical setting.

基于功能的临床访谈评估儿童行为问题的发展与实施
儿童被转介给心理健康提供者的最常见原因与行为和情感问题有关。如果不进行干预,有适应不良行为的儿童在以后的生活中会有学习成绩差、人际交往困难和重大行为问题的风险。先前对这些问题评估的研究主要集中在照顾者自我报告问卷、观察编码和/或诊断分类上。行为学文献中很少有从主要利益相关者那里获取有意义的临床信息的最佳实践面试策略的例子。由于在最初的访谈中,照顾者报告对于更好地了解孩子的表现问题至关重要,并且考虑到评估的主要作用是将信息整合到基于证据的干预措施的设计中(Barlow et al., 2005),因此有必要发表关于这些临床相互作用内容的额外指南。下面的论文概述了一种方法,以一种与治疗计划密切相关的方式,从照顾者那里收集有关儿童行为的相关信息。此外,作者还包括效度和信度数据,以证实访谈在临床环境中的持续使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: Cognitive and Behavioral Practice is a quarterly international journal that serves an enduring resource for empirically informed methods of clinical practice. Its mission is to bridge the gap between published research and the actual clinical practice of cognitive behavior therapy. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice publishes clinically rich accounts of innovative assessment and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that are clearly grounded in empirical research. A focus on application and implementation of procedures is maintained.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信