Integrating biomarkers and multi-parametric MRI to provide enhanced clinical diagnosis for prostate cancer

J. Alter, D. Albala
{"title":"Integrating biomarkers and multi-parametric MRI to provide enhanced clinical diagnosis for prostate cancer","authors":"J. Alter, D. Albala","doi":"10.3389/fruro.2023.1235944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prostate cancer (PCa) risk assessment can incorporate clinical features, gene expression, protein ‘biomarkers’ or imaging. In this review the benefits of layering multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) with other risk assessment methods is considered. mpMRI is an increasingly utilized risk assessment tool in prostate cancer. The European Association of Urology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines call for mpMRI utilization in the prostate cancer management pathway. As such, the NCCN Guidelines and AUA guidelines emphasize differing levels of reliance on mpMRI preceding prostate biopsy. However, like all risk assessment tools, mpMRI has strengths and limitations. This include dependencies on reader expertise and interpretation, equipment and process standardization, tumor size, tumor multifocality, tissue architecture, ethnic and racial disparity, and cost. Thus, layering complementary risk assessment methods to mitigate the limitations of each approach, enables the most informed clinical management. The goal of ongoing biomarker/mpMRI studies is to provide insight into the clinically helpful integration of the two approaches. For new technologies to be adapted or layered together synergistically, five specific competencies must be considered acceptable: (1) efficacy, (2) potential side effect levels, (3) ease of use of technology, (4) cost vs. clinical benefit, and (5) durability.","PeriodicalId":73113,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fruro.2023.1235944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) risk assessment can incorporate clinical features, gene expression, protein ‘biomarkers’ or imaging. In this review the benefits of layering multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) with other risk assessment methods is considered. mpMRI is an increasingly utilized risk assessment tool in prostate cancer. The European Association of Urology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines call for mpMRI utilization in the prostate cancer management pathway. As such, the NCCN Guidelines and AUA guidelines emphasize differing levels of reliance on mpMRI preceding prostate biopsy. However, like all risk assessment tools, mpMRI has strengths and limitations. This include dependencies on reader expertise and interpretation, equipment and process standardization, tumor size, tumor multifocality, tissue architecture, ethnic and racial disparity, and cost. Thus, layering complementary risk assessment methods to mitigate the limitations of each approach, enables the most informed clinical management. The goal of ongoing biomarker/mpMRI studies is to provide insight into the clinically helpful integration of the two approaches. For new technologies to be adapted or layered together synergistically, five specific competencies must be considered acceptable: (1) efficacy, (2) potential side effect levels, (3) ease of use of technology, (4) cost vs. clinical benefit, and (5) durability.
结合生物标志物和多参数MRI为前列腺癌提供增强的临床诊断
前列腺癌症(PCa)风险评估可以包括临床特征、基因表达、蛋白质“生物标志物”或成像。在这篇综述中,考虑了将多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)与其他风险评估方法分层的好处。mpMRI是一种越来越多用于前列腺癌症的风险评估工具。欧洲泌尿外科协会、国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)和美国泌尿外科协会(AUA)指南呼吁在前列腺癌症管理途径中使用mpMRI。因此,NCCN指南和AUA指南强调前列腺活检前对mpMRI的依赖程度不同。然而,与所有风险评估工具一样,mpMRI也有优势和局限性。这包括对读者专业知识和解释、设备和过程标准化、肿瘤大小、肿瘤多灶性、组织结构、种族和种族差异以及成本的依赖。因此,将互补的风险评估方法分层以减轻每种方法的局限性,可以实现最知情的临床管理。正在进行的生物标志物/mpMRI研究的目标是深入了解这两种方法的临床整合。对于协同适应或分层的新技术,必须认为五种特定能力是可接受的:(1)疗效,(2)潜在副作用水平,(3)技术的易用性,(4)成本与临床效益,以及(5)耐用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信