Online self-radicalisation: a case study of cognitive vulnerabilities for radicalization to extremism and single actor terrorism

IF 0.5 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Ryan A. Little, Peter Ford, A. Girardi
{"title":"Online self-radicalisation: a case study of cognitive vulnerabilities for radicalization to extremism and single actor terrorism","authors":"Ryan A. Little, Peter Ford, A. Girardi","doi":"10.1108/jidob-03-2021-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nUnderstanding the psychological risk factors in radicalisation and terrorism is typically limited by both a lack of access to individuals who carry out the acts and those who are willing to engage in research on the matter. The purpose of this study is to describe the process of self-radicalisation of an otherwise law-abiding individual who engaged in single-actor terrorism activities.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA single case study, based on clinical interviews and psychometric testing, of an individual with autism who engaged in multiple acts of terrorism through online activity. The case is presented within existing frameworks of radicalisation, and describes how it developed along the steps described in the path to intended violence.\n\n\nFindings\nA number of variables are identified as contributing towards the individual’s vulnerability to radicalisation, such as deficits in higher order cognition, psychopathology, autism spectrum disorder traits, personal interests, social isolation and life stressors.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nUnique to this study is how the process of radicalisation and the possibility to carry out the individual’s attacks was made possible only through the use of internet technology.\n","PeriodicalId":43468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jidob-03-2021-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose Understanding the psychological risk factors in radicalisation and terrorism is typically limited by both a lack of access to individuals who carry out the acts and those who are willing to engage in research on the matter. The purpose of this study is to describe the process of self-radicalisation of an otherwise law-abiding individual who engaged in single-actor terrorism activities. Design/methodology/approach A single case study, based on clinical interviews and psychometric testing, of an individual with autism who engaged in multiple acts of terrorism through online activity. The case is presented within existing frameworks of radicalisation, and describes how it developed along the steps described in the path to intended violence. Findings A number of variables are identified as contributing towards the individual’s vulnerability to radicalisation, such as deficits in higher order cognition, psychopathology, autism spectrum disorder traits, personal interests, social isolation and life stressors. Originality/value Unique to this study is how the process of radicalisation and the possibility to carry out the individual’s attacks was made possible only through the use of internet technology.
网络自我激进化:极端主义激进化和单一行为者恐怖主义认知脆弱性的案例研究
了解激进化和恐怖主义的心理风险因素通常受到限制,因为缺乏接触到实施这些行为的个人和那些愿意从事这一问题研究的人。本研究的目的是描述一个守法的人在从事单一行为者的恐怖主义活动时的自我激进化过程。设计/方法/方法基于临床访谈和心理测量测试的单一案例研究,研究一名自闭症患者通过网络活动参与了多次恐怖主义行为。该案例是在现有的激进化框架内提出的,并描述了它是如何沿着有意暴力之路所描述的步骤发展的。研究发现,导致个人容易激进化的因素有很多,如高级认知缺陷、精神病理、自闭症谱系障碍特征、个人兴趣、社会孤立和生活压力。独创性/价值本研究的独特之处在于,激进化的过程和实施个人攻击的可能性如何仅通过使用互联网技术才成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信