K. N. Reddy, Shilpa Gahlot, Somnath Baidya Roy, Gudimetla Venkateswara Varma, V. Sehgal, Gayatri Vangala
{"title":"Carbon fluxes in spring wheat agroecosystem in India","authors":"K. N. Reddy, Shilpa Gahlot, Somnath Baidya Roy, Gudimetla Venkateswara Varma, V. Sehgal, Gayatri Vangala","doi":"10.5194/esd-14-915-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Carbon fluxes from agroecosystems contribute to the\nvariability of the carbon cycle and atmospheric [CO2]. This study is a\nfollow-up to Gahlot et al. (2020), which used the Integrated Science\nAssessment Model (ISAM) to examine spring wheat production and its drivers.\nIn this study, we look at the carbon fluxes and their drivers. ISAM\nwas calibrated and validated against the crop phenology at the IARI wheat\nexperimental site in Gahlot et al. (2020). We extended the validation of\nthe\nmodel on a regional scale by comparing modeled leaf area index (LAI) and yield against site-scale observations and regional datasets. Later, ISAM-simulated carbon\nfluxes were validated against an experimental spring wheat site at IARI for\nthe growing season of 2013–2014. Additionally, we compared with the published\ncarbon flux data and found that ISAM captures the seasonality well.\nFollowing that, regional-scale runs were performed. The results revealed\nthat fluxes vary significantly across regions, primarily owing to\ndifferences in planting dates. During the study period, all fluxes showed\nstatistically significant increasing trends (p<0.1). Gross primary production (GPP), net primary production (NPP), autotrophic\nrespiration (Ra), and heterotrophic respiration\n(Rh) increased at 1.272,\n0.945, 0.579, 0.328, and 0.366 TgC yr−2, respectively. Numerical experiments\nwere conducted to investigate how natural forcings such as changing\ntemperature and [CO2] levels as well as agricultural management practices such\nas\nnitrogen fertilization and water availability could contribute to the\nrising\ntrends. The experiments revealed that increasing [CO2], nitrogen\nfertilization, and irrigation water contributed to increased carbon fluxes,\nwith nitrogen fertilization having the most significant effect.\n","PeriodicalId":92775,"journal":{"name":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-915-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract. Carbon fluxes from agroecosystems contribute to the
variability of the carbon cycle and atmospheric [CO2]. This study is a
follow-up to Gahlot et al. (2020), which used the Integrated Science
Assessment Model (ISAM) to examine spring wheat production and its drivers.
In this study, we look at the carbon fluxes and their drivers. ISAM
was calibrated and validated against the crop phenology at the IARI wheat
experimental site in Gahlot et al. (2020). We extended the validation of
the
model on a regional scale by comparing modeled leaf area index (LAI) and yield against site-scale observations and regional datasets. Later, ISAM-simulated carbon
fluxes were validated against an experimental spring wheat site at IARI for
the growing season of 2013–2014. Additionally, we compared with the published
carbon flux data and found that ISAM captures the seasonality well.
Following that, regional-scale runs were performed. The results revealed
that fluxes vary significantly across regions, primarily owing to
differences in planting dates. During the study period, all fluxes showed
statistically significant increasing trends (p<0.1). Gross primary production (GPP), net primary production (NPP), autotrophic
respiration (Ra), and heterotrophic respiration
(Rh) increased at 1.272,
0.945, 0.579, 0.328, and 0.366 TgC yr−2, respectively. Numerical experiments
were conducted to investigate how natural forcings such as changing
temperature and [CO2] levels as well as agricultural management practices such
as
nitrogen fertilization and water availability could contribute to the
rising
trends. The experiments revealed that increasing [CO2], nitrogen
fertilization, and irrigation water contributed to increased carbon fluxes,
with nitrogen fertilization having the most significant effect.