From the Stage to the High Seas: Concluding Thoughts on the Present and Future of EU Legal Studies

IF 1.6 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

European Constitutional Law Review Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1017/S1574019622000414

A. Bailleux

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Difference between social science analyses of law and legal analyses – Theatre metaphor to understand the difference – Internal and external points of view – Necessity for legal analysis to use materials lying outside the classical pyramid of formal sources – Overview of the spectrum of legal research – Legally relevant texts and practices – Interdisciplinary approaches to law and lawyers’ disciplinary edge.

查看原文本刊更多论文

从舞台到公海:对欧盟法律研究现状与未来的总结性思考

法律的社会科学分析和法律分析之间的差异——理解差异的戏剧隐喻——内部和外部观点——法律分析使用形式来源的经典金字塔之外的材料的必要性——法律研究范围概述——法律相关文本和实践——跨学科的法律方法律师的纪律优势。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Constitutional Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), a peer reviewed English language journal, is a platform for advancing the study of European constitutional law, its history and evolution. Its scope is European law and constitutional law, history and theory, comparative law and jurisprudence. Published triannually, it contains articles on doctrine, scholarship and history, plus jurisprudence and book reviews. However, the premier issue includes more than twenty short articles by leading experts, each addressing a single topic in the Draft Constitutional Treaty for Europe. EuConst is addressed at academics, professionals, politicians and others involved or interested in the European constitutional process.