Electronic Audio Feedback in Legal Education

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
D. Carter, A. Vogl, E. Methven, L. Billington
{"title":"Electronic Audio Feedback in Legal Education","authors":"D. Carter, A. Vogl, E. Methven, L. Billington","doi":"10.53300/001c.39640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The provision of high quality, effective feedback is critical to supporting student learning. In tertiary legal education, student feedback is commonly provided in written form, with the benefits of audio or multimodal feedback underexplored. Academics regularly express dissatisfaction regarding the time it takes to provide assessment feedback and a perceived lack of student engagement with it. Students also report concerns relating to the tone, quality and timeliness of the feedback they receive. This article discusses the findings of a program which used electronic audio feedback amongst undergraduate and postgraduate law students at an Australian university to explore whether a change in mode from written to audio or multimodal feedback could offer a solution to these challenges. It explains the pedagogical implications that arose from the use of electronic audio feedback, including that the provision of feedback in an audio mode allowed for the provision of more detailed feedback in a comparably shorter period of time; compelled students to engage with feedback in a sustained fashion; was able to simulate an authentic feedback experience in professional practice; better facilitated personalised, constructive feedback; and, when used alongside written feedback, catered to a greater variety of learning approaches.","PeriodicalId":43058,"journal":{"name":"Legal Education Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.39640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The provision of high quality, effective feedback is critical to supporting student learning. In tertiary legal education, student feedback is commonly provided in written form, with the benefits of audio or multimodal feedback underexplored. Academics regularly express dissatisfaction regarding the time it takes to provide assessment feedback and a perceived lack of student engagement with it. Students also report concerns relating to the tone, quality and timeliness of the feedback they receive. This article discusses the findings of a program which used electronic audio feedback amongst undergraduate and postgraduate law students at an Australian university to explore whether a change in mode from written to audio or multimodal feedback could offer a solution to these challenges. It explains the pedagogical implications that arose from the use of electronic audio feedback, including that the provision of feedback in an audio mode allowed for the provision of more detailed feedback in a comparably shorter period of time; compelled students to engage with feedback in a sustained fashion; was able to simulate an authentic feedback experience in professional practice; better facilitated personalised, constructive feedback; and, when used alongside written feedback, catered to a greater variety of learning approaches.
法律教育中的电子音频反馈
提供高质量、有效的反馈对支持学生学习至关重要。在高等法律教育中,学生的反馈通常以书面形式提供,而音频或多模式反馈的好处尚未得到充分开发。学者们经常对提供评估反馈所需的时间和学生缺乏参与表示不满。学生们还反映了他们对反馈的语气、质量和及时性的担忧。本文讨论了一个项目的研究结果,该项目在澳大利亚一所大学的法学本科生和研究生中使用电子音频反馈,以探索从书面到音频或多模态反馈模式的改变是否可以提供解决这些挑战的方法。它解释了使用电子音频反馈所产生的教学影响,包括以音频方式提供反馈可以在相对较短的时间内提供更详细的反馈;迫使学生以持续的方式参与反馈;能够在专业实践中模拟真实的反馈体验;更便利的个性化、建设性反馈;并且,当与书面反馈一起使用时,迎合了更多种类的学习方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Legal Education Review
Legal Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
66.70%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信