A brief comparison of forensic psychology in South Africa, the United States, and Canada

IF 1.9 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A. Pillay, W. Gowensmith, R. Roesch, Alexandra Hopkins
{"title":"A brief comparison of forensic psychology in South Africa, the United States, and Canada","authors":"A. Pillay, W. Gowensmith, R. Roesch, Alexandra Hopkins","doi":"10.1177/00812463221128166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considering forensic psychology’s varying stages of development across the world, this work briefly explores historical developments, the field of practice, training, licensing, legislation, and associated challenges in South Africa, the United States, and Canada. While there are numerous similarities, a few differences are evident. Among the common areas of practice, psychologists are involved in assessments to determine fitness (competency) to stand trial, criminal responsibility in adults, as well as assisting courts in making determinations on criminal responsibility in the case of children in conflict with the law. In South Africa, psychological assessments of sexual violence complainants with intellectual disability are also required by courts. Psychological intervention, research, and policy development work are also conducted in the three countries. Challenges appear in the intersection between psychology and the law, expectations of psychologists, and the inclusion of psychologists in evaluation panels in South Africa and Canada. It is clear that psychologists are playing an active role in the professional development of the field, research, and coordinating with legislative authorities in advancing forensic mental health and advocating for people with mental health problems. However, across the three countries, there is a need for continued focus on the broader issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion with respect to the forensic populations being served, and there has to be a concerted effort to address the psychosocial needs of marginalized communities.","PeriodicalId":47237,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00812463221128166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering forensic psychology’s varying stages of development across the world, this work briefly explores historical developments, the field of practice, training, licensing, legislation, and associated challenges in South Africa, the United States, and Canada. While there are numerous similarities, a few differences are evident. Among the common areas of practice, psychologists are involved in assessments to determine fitness (competency) to stand trial, criminal responsibility in adults, as well as assisting courts in making determinations on criminal responsibility in the case of children in conflict with the law. In South Africa, psychological assessments of sexual violence complainants with intellectual disability are also required by courts. Psychological intervention, research, and policy development work are also conducted in the three countries. Challenges appear in the intersection between psychology and the law, expectations of psychologists, and the inclusion of psychologists in evaluation panels in South Africa and Canada. It is clear that psychologists are playing an active role in the professional development of the field, research, and coordinating with legislative authorities in advancing forensic mental health and advocating for people with mental health problems. However, across the three countries, there is a need for continued focus on the broader issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion with respect to the forensic populations being served, and there has to be a concerted effort to address the psychosocial needs of marginalized communities.
南非、美国和加拿大法医心理学的简要比较
考虑到法医心理学在世界各地发展的不同阶段,本作品简要探讨了南非、美国和加拿大的历史发展、实践领域、培训、许可、立法和相关挑战。虽然有许多相似之处,但也有一些明显的差异。在常见的实践领域中,心理学家参与评估,以确定是否适合接受审判,成年人的刑事责任,以及协助法院在违反法律的儿童案件中确定刑事责任。在南非,法院还要求对智力残疾的性暴力投诉者进行心理评估。心理干预、研究和政策制定工作也在这三个国家进行。在南非和加拿大,挑战出现在心理学和法律之间的交叉,心理学家的期望,以及心理学家在评估小组中的纳入。很明显,心理学家在该领域的专业发展、研究和与立法当局协调方面发挥了积极作用,以促进法医心理健康和为有心理健康问题的人宣传。然而,在这三个国家,有必要继续关注所服务的法医群体的多样性、公平性和包容性等更广泛的问题,并且必须共同努力解决边缘化社区的社会心理需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South African Journal of Psychology
South African Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Psychology publishes contributions in English from all fields of psychology. While the emphasis is on empirical research, the Journal also accepts theoretical and methodological papers, review articles, short communications, reviews and letters containing fair commentary. Priority is given to articles which are relevant to Africa and which address psychological issues of social change and development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信