Brazilian sociological theory and postcolonial criticism

Q3 Social Sciences
Lucas Amaral de Oliveira, Ana Rodrigues Cavalcanti Alves
{"title":"Brazilian sociological theory and postcolonial criticism","authors":"Lucas Amaral de Oliveira, Ana Rodrigues Cavalcanti Alves","doi":"10.1590/s0102-6992-202338010009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article discusses to what extent sociological theories produced in the Brazilian academic field dialogue with a global intellectual movement criticizing coloniality and the Eurocentric foundations of the social sciences. Initially, we analyze the challenges regarding the attempts to define two theoretical approaches, Brazilian sociology, and Postcolonial Thought, without overlooking their internal heterogeneities. Then, we address the tensions between these approaches as conditions for research agendas that bring both contributions into proximity. Finally, we explore the epistemological potential of one of these agendas, which corresponds to a rereading of Brazilian sociological theory in light of postcolonial criticism. This exercise in rereading the canon is based on the methodological program of sociological reduction of Guerreiro Ramos, which indicates a reciprocal interrogation between Brazilian sociology and postcolonial thought, i.e., a decentered look at our sociological tradition that also reveals contributions from this tradition for the future of postcolonial epistemologies.","PeriodicalId":35260,"journal":{"name":"Sociedade e Estado","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociedade e Estado","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202338010009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The article discusses to what extent sociological theories produced in the Brazilian academic field dialogue with a global intellectual movement criticizing coloniality and the Eurocentric foundations of the social sciences. Initially, we analyze the challenges regarding the attempts to define two theoretical approaches, Brazilian sociology, and Postcolonial Thought, without overlooking their internal heterogeneities. Then, we address the tensions between these approaches as conditions for research agendas that bring both contributions into proximity. Finally, we explore the epistemological potential of one of these agendas, which corresponds to a rereading of Brazilian sociological theory in light of postcolonial criticism. This exercise in rereading the canon is based on the methodological program of sociological reduction of Guerreiro Ramos, which indicates a reciprocal interrogation between Brazilian sociology and postcolonial thought, i.e., a decentered look at our sociological tradition that also reveals contributions from this tradition for the future of postcolonial epistemologies.
巴西社会学理论与后殖民批评
摘要本文讨论了社会学理论在巴西学术领域与批评殖民主义和欧洲中心社会科学基础的全球知识运动的对话中产生的程度。首先,我们分析了在不忽视其内部异质性的情况下,试图定义两种理论方法(巴西社会学和后殖民思想)的挑战。然后,我们将这些方法之间的紧张关系作为研究议程的条件,使这两种贡献接近。最后,我们探讨了其中一个议程的认识论潜力,这与根据后殖民批评重读巴西社会学理论相对应。重读正典的这一练习是基于Guerreiro Ramos的社会学还原的方法论程序,这表明巴西社会学和后殖民思想之间的相互审问,即对我们的社会学传统进行了分散的审视,也揭示了这一传统对后殖民认识论未来的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sociedade e Estado
Sociedade e Estado Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The review Sociedade e Estado has been edited by the Department of Sociology at the University of Brasilia since of 1986. In this period, original works related to Social Sciences were published in the following categories: theoretical studies, critical reviews of literature, research reports, technical reports, reviews and notices. Its abbreviated title is Soc. estado, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信