Eksterne faktore wat die seksueel misbruikte kind verhoed om doeltreffend in Suid-Afrikaanse howe te getuig: ’n Vlugtige oorsig

IF 0.2 4区 文学 Q4 SOCIAL ISSUES
L. Buys, C. Wessels
{"title":"Eksterne faktore wat die seksueel misbruikte kind verhoed om doeltreffend in Suid-Afrikaanse howe te getuig: ’n Vlugtige oorsig","authors":"L. Buys, C. Wessels","doi":"10.17159/2224-7912/2022/v62n2a4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"External factors preventing the sexually abused child to testify effectively in a South African court: A rapid review Child sexual abuse is an epidemic that adversely affects the whole of society. The conviction rate of sexual offenders is exceptionally low in South Africa (SAPS, 2019). There are several factors in the court process that prevent children from testifying effectively in court. These factors were researched in this article by means of a rapid review. The purpose of the research is to examine the legal system in South Africa regarding the court procedures in which children are involved and to identify the factors that influence children’s testimony. We focused on external factors related to court proceedings. Various databases were searched, namely SA Publications, Sabinet, EBSCO-Host, LexisNexis, and Juta. The PRISMA guidelines were used for the quality appraisal of the articles. Both the title and summary of an article were examined to determine the relevance of the data. There were two researchers involved in the study: the first researcher launched the study and the second researcher ensured quality. From the eventual eight articles selected, factors were identified and thematically analysed to identify the external factors as outlined in this article. Eight factors were identified that prevent children from testifying effectively in court. In more than 60% of the articles, it was shown that inadequate court preparation causes children to testify less effectively; so proper court preparation is of great value in obtaining more effective evidence. A quarter of the articles show that contact with the alleged offender or the possibility of contact during the court proceedings provokes excessive tension in the child as a witness. The tension and anxiety cause children to testify less effectively. In 37,5% of the articles, it was shown that the delay in court proceedings is directly related to poor evidence given by children and that this is a common problem in the South African legal system. More than 85% of the articles have shown that there is a reason for insufficient child participation in the South African courts, due to a lack of sufficient resources. The child misuse in 25% of the articles that a lack of adequate support for the family and the child influenced the effectiveness of the evidence provided. Parents of child witnesses cannot provide sufficient support to their child alone, as they themselves do not necessarily have all the answers about court proceedings and in many cases, one of them is the perpetrator. Due to anxiety and stress, highlighted in 75% of the articles, the quality of evidence is affected, because stress levels of the witnessing process affect children’s recall of events and memory. It is extremely important to reduce the stress to as little as possible. In 50% of the articles, reference is made to secondary victimisation, and it has been shown that it has a tremendous impact on the child’s ability to participate meaningfully in court proceedings. What is needed is that staff working in and around the court should receive thorough training and have the necessary awareness to be able to adequately address the issues mentioned above. It is crucial to consider that the factors are not independent of the socio-economic factors that already affect the daily lives of underprivileged children. The article is concluded by providing a list of factors that influence children’s participation in the court process in the South African courts. Although the findings and recommendations have been formulated in the form of an article, more empirical research is needed to investigate the factors thoroughly in future studies.","PeriodicalId":42800,"journal":{"name":"Tydskrif Vir Geesteswetenskappe","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tydskrif Vir Geesteswetenskappe","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2224-7912/2022/v62n2a4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

External factors preventing the sexually abused child to testify effectively in a South African court: A rapid review Child sexual abuse is an epidemic that adversely affects the whole of society. The conviction rate of sexual offenders is exceptionally low in South Africa (SAPS, 2019). There are several factors in the court process that prevent children from testifying effectively in court. These factors were researched in this article by means of a rapid review. The purpose of the research is to examine the legal system in South Africa regarding the court procedures in which children are involved and to identify the factors that influence children’s testimony. We focused on external factors related to court proceedings. Various databases were searched, namely SA Publications, Sabinet, EBSCO-Host, LexisNexis, and Juta. The PRISMA guidelines were used for the quality appraisal of the articles. Both the title and summary of an article were examined to determine the relevance of the data. There were two researchers involved in the study: the first researcher launched the study and the second researcher ensured quality. From the eventual eight articles selected, factors were identified and thematically analysed to identify the external factors as outlined in this article. Eight factors were identified that prevent children from testifying effectively in court. In more than 60% of the articles, it was shown that inadequate court preparation causes children to testify less effectively; so proper court preparation is of great value in obtaining more effective evidence. A quarter of the articles show that contact with the alleged offender or the possibility of contact during the court proceedings provokes excessive tension in the child as a witness. The tension and anxiety cause children to testify less effectively. In 37,5% of the articles, it was shown that the delay in court proceedings is directly related to poor evidence given by children and that this is a common problem in the South African legal system. More than 85% of the articles have shown that there is a reason for insufficient child participation in the South African courts, due to a lack of sufficient resources. The child misuse in 25% of the articles that a lack of adequate support for the family and the child influenced the effectiveness of the evidence provided. Parents of child witnesses cannot provide sufficient support to their child alone, as they themselves do not necessarily have all the answers about court proceedings and in many cases, one of them is the perpetrator. Due to anxiety and stress, highlighted in 75% of the articles, the quality of evidence is affected, because stress levels of the witnessing process affect children’s recall of events and memory. It is extremely important to reduce the stress to as little as possible. In 50% of the articles, reference is made to secondary victimisation, and it has been shown that it has a tremendous impact on the child’s ability to participate meaningfully in court proceedings. What is needed is that staff working in and around the court should receive thorough training and have the necessary awareness to be able to adequately address the issues mentioned above. It is crucial to consider that the factors are not independent of the socio-economic factors that already affect the daily lives of underprivileged children. The article is concluded by providing a list of factors that influence children’s participation in the court process in the South African courts. Although the findings and recommendations have been formulated in the form of an article, more empirical research is needed to investigate the factors thoroughly in future studies.
南非为显示客观影响而引发儿童性虐待的外部因素:一项高速调查
阻止受到性虐待的儿童在南非法庭上有效作证的外部因素:快速审查儿童性虐待是一种对整个社会产生不利影响的流行病。南非性犯罪者的定罪率非常低(SAPS, 2019)。法庭程序中有几个因素妨碍儿童在法庭上有效作证。本文采用快速回顾的方法对这些因素进行了研究。这项研究的目的是审查南非关于涉及儿童的法庭程序的法律制度,并查明影响儿童证词的因素。我们重点关注与法庭程序有关的外部因素。检索了各种数据库,即SA Publications、Sabinet、EBSCO-Host、LexisNexis和Juta。采用PRISMA指南对文章进行质量评价。文章的标题和摘要都进行了检查,以确定数据的相关性。有两个研究人员参与了这项研究:第一个研究人员发起了这项研究,第二个研究人员确保了质量。从最终选定的八篇文章中,确定了因素并对其进行了主题分析,以确定本文中概述的外部因素。确定了妨碍儿童在法庭上有效作证的八个因素。超过60%的文章表明,法庭准备不足会导致儿童作证效率降低;因此,适当的法庭准备对于获得更有效的证据具有重要的价值。四分之一的条款表明,与被指控的罪犯接触或在法庭诉讼期间接触的可能性会引起作为证人的儿童过度紧张。紧张和焦虑会导致孩子作证的效率降低。37.5%的文章表明,法庭诉讼的拖延与儿童提供的证据不足直接相关,这是南非法律制度中的一个普遍问题。超过85%的文章表明,由于缺乏足够的资源,南非法院的儿童参与不足是有原因的。在25%的文章中,儿童滥用表明,对家庭和儿童缺乏足够的支持影响了所提供证据的有效性。儿童证人的父母不能单独为他们的孩子提供足够的支持,因为他们自己不一定对法庭诉讼程序有全部的答案,而且在许多情况下,其中一人就是犯罪者。75%的文章强调,由于焦虑和压力,证据的质量受到影响,因为目击过程的压力水平会影响儿童对事件的回忆和记忆。尽量减少压力是非常重要的。在50%的文章中,提到了二次受害,并且已经证明它对儿童有意义地参与法庭诉讼的能力有巨大的影响。所需要的是,在法院内外工作的工作人员应接受彻底的培训,并具有必要的意识,以便能够充分解决上述问题。必须考虑到,这些因素并非独立于已经影响到贫困儿童日常生活的社会经济因素之外。文章最后列出了影响儿童在南非法院参与法庭程序的因素清单。虽然研究结果和建议已经以文章的形式制定,但在未来的研究中,需要更多的实证研究来彻底调查这些因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Die Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe word gewy aan die publikasie van oorspronklike navorsing en oorsigartikels in die teologie, kuns en kulturele, sosiale, ekonomiese en opvoedkundige wetenskappe, sowel as aan boekbesprekings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信