A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of Multidimensional Trait Perfectionism Self-Report Measures

IF 1.5 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Behaviour Change Pub Date : 2020-05-27 DOI:10.1017/bec.2020.2

Alice Lo, C. Hunt, Maree J. Abbott

{"title":"A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of Multidimensional Trait Perfectionism Self-Report Measures","authors":"Alice Lo, C. Hunt, Maree J. Abbott","doi":"10.1017/bec.2020.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Different and evolving conceptualisations of perfectionism have led to the development of numerous perfectionism measures in an attempt to capture the true representations of the construct. It is, therefore, important to ensure that these instruments are valid and reliable. The present systematic review examined the literature for the psychometric properties of the most commonly used general multidimensional trait perfectionism self-report measures. Relevant studies were identified by a systematic electronic search of academic databases. A total of 349 studies were identified, with 38 of these meeting inclusion criteria. The psychometric properties presented in each of these studies were subjected to assessment using a standardised protocol. All studies were evaluated by two reviewers independently. Results indicated that while none of the included measures demonstrated adequacy across all of the nine psychometric properties assessed, most were found to possess adequate internal consistency and construct validity. The absence of evidence to support adequate measurement properties over a number of domains for the measures included in this review may be attributed to the criteria of adequacy used, with some appearing overly strict and less relevant to perfectionism measures. Clinical and research relevance of the present findings and directions for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46485,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/bec.2020.2","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Change","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bec.2020.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Different and evolving conceptualisations of perfectionism have led to the development of numerous perfectionism measures in an attempt to capture the true representations of the construct. It is, therefore, important to ensure that these instruments are valid and reliable. The present systematic review examined the literature for the psychometric properties of the most commonly used general multidimensional trait perfectionism self-report measures. Relevant studies were identified by a systematic electronic search of academic databases. A total of 349 studies were identified, with 38 of these meeting inclusion criteria. The psychometric properties presented in each of these studies were subjected to assessment using a standardised protocol. All studies were evaluated by two reviewers independently. Results indicated that while none of the included measures demonstrated adequacy across all of the nine psychometric properties assessed, most were found to possess adequate internal consistency and construct validity. The absence of evidence to support adequate measurement properties over a number of domains for the measures included in this review may be attributed to the criteria of adequacy used, with some appearing overly strict and less relevant to perfectionism measures. Clinical and research relevance of the present findings and directions for future research are discussed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

多维特质完美主义自我报告量表心理测量特性的系统回顾

完美主义的不同和不断发展的概念导致了许多完美主义测量的发展，试图捕捉结构的真实表征。因此，重要的是要确保这些文书的有效性和可靠性。本系统综述检查了文献中最常用的一般多维特质完美主义自我报告测量的心理测量特性。通过对学术数据库进行系统的电子检索，确定了相关研究。共确定了349项研究，其中38项符合纳入标准。使用标准化方案对每项研究中呈现的心理测量特性进行评估。所有研究均由两名评审员独立评估。结果表明，虽然在评估的九个心理测量特性中，没有一个被纳入的测量显示出充分性，但大多数被发现具有足够的内部一致性和结构有效性。缺乏证据支持本审查中所包含的措施在多个领域具有足够的测量特性，这可能归因于所使用的充分性标准，其中一些似乎过于严格，与完美主义措施不太相关。讨论了当前发现的临床和研究相关性以及未来研究的方向。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Behaviour Change PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Behaviour Change is the journal of the Australian Association for Cognitive and Behavioural Therapy and has long been considered a leader in its field. It is a quarterly journal that publishes research involving the application of behavioural and cognitive-behavioural principles and techniques to the assessment and treatment of various problems. Features of Behaviour Change include: original empirical studies using either single subject or group comparison methodologies review articles case studies brief technical and clinical notes book reviews special issues dealing with particular topics in depth.