Predictive uncertainty assessment in flood forecasting using quantile regression

IF 1.5 Q4 WATER RESOURCES
Amina M. K., C. N. R.
{"title":"Predictive uncertainty assessment in flood forecasting using quantile regression","authors":"Amina M. K., C. N. R.","doi":"10.2166/h2oj.2023.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Floods and their associated impacts are topics of concern in land development planning and management, which call for efficient flood forecasting and warning systems. The performance of flood warning systems is affected by uncertainty in water level forecasts, which is due to their inability to measure or calculate a modeled value accurately. Predictive uncertainty is an emerging type of uncertainty modeling technique that emphasizes total uncertainty quantified as a probability distribution conditioned on all available knowledge. Predictive uncertainty analysis was done using quantile regression (QR) for machine learning-based flood models – Hybrid Wavelet Artificial Neural Network model (WANN) and Hybrid Wavelet Support Vector Machine model (WSVM) for different lead times. Comparing QR models of WANN and WSVM revealed that the slope, intercept, spread of forecast, and width of confidence band of the WANN model are more for each quantile indicating more uncertainty as compared to the WSVM model. In both models, with an increase in lead time, uncertainty has shown an increasing trend as well. The performance evaluation of inference obtained from QR models was evaluated using uncertainty statistics such as prediction interval coverage probability, average relative interval length (ARIL), and mean prediction interval (MPI).","PeriodicalId":36060,"journal":{"name":"H2Open Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"H2Open Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/h2oj.2023.040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Floods and their associated impacts are topics of concern in land development planning and management, which call for efficient flood forecasting and warning systems. The performance of flood warning systems is affected by uncertainty in water level forecasts, which is due to their inability to measure or calculate a modeled value accurately. Predictive uncertainty is an emerging type of uncertainty modeling technique that emphasizes total uncertainty quantified as a probability distribution conditioned on all available knowledge. Predictive uncertainty analysis was done using quantile regression (QR) for machine learning-based flood models – Hybrid Wavelet Artificial Neural Network model (WANN) and Hybrid Wavelet Support Vector Machine model (WSVM) for different lead times. Comparing QR models of WANN and WSVM revealed that the slope, intercept, spread of forecast, and width of confidence band of the WANN model are more for each quantile indicating more uncertainty as compared to the WSVM model. In both models, with an increase in lead time, uncertainty has shown an increasing trend as well. The performance evaluation of inference obtained from QR models was evaluated using uncertainty statistics such as prediction interval coverage probability, average relative interval length (ARIL), and mean prediction interval (MPI).
分位数回归在洪水预报中的预测不确定性评估
洪水及其相关影响是土地开发规划和管理中关注的主题,这需要高效的洪水预测和预警系统。洪水预警系统的性能受到水位预测不确定性的影响,这是由于它们无法准确测量或计算模型值。预测不确定性是一种新兴的不确定性建模技术,它强调将总不确定性量化为以所有可用知识为条件的概率分布。使用分位数回归(QR)对不同提前期的基于机器学习的洪水模型——混合小波人工神经网络模型(WANN)和混合小波支持向量机模型(WSVM)进行预测不确定性分析。比较WANN和WSVM的QR模型表明,与WSVM模型相比,WANN模型的斜率、截距、预测范围和置信带宽度对于每个分位数都更大,表明存在更多的不确定性。在这两种模型中,随着交付周期的增加,不确定性也呈现出增加的趋势。使用不确定性统计(如预测区间覆盖概率、平均相对区间长度(ARIL)和平均预测区间(MPI))来评估从QR模型获得的推理的性能评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
H2Open Journal
H2Open Journal Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信