Use of self-help manual for the management of obsessive–compulsive disorder: Effectiveness in Indian context

IF 0.6 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Sneh Kapoor, M. Mehta, R. Sagar
{"title":"Use of self-help manual for the management of obsessive–compulsive disorder: Effectiveness in Indian context","authors":"Sneh Kapoor, M. Mehta, R. Sagar","doi":"10.4103/jmhhb.jmhhb_38_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The past few decades have seen great strides in the field of psychotherapy. With the advancement in technology, alternative modes of therapy dissemination such as computers, telemental health, and manuals are being explored. Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) has increasingly come under the purview of these modes, particularly for the delivery of self-directed exposure and response prevention. The current study explores the effectiveness of self-help manuals (SHMs) in the management of OCD. Methods: The study employed a pre- and post-experimental design. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the three conditions (independent variable) – Therapist-directed Intervention, SHM, and Control Group. Outcome measures used (Dependent Variables) were symptom severity scores as assessed on Yale–Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Sixty participants between the ages of 15–45 years were screened and assigned to one of the three conditions. The therapist-directed group received exposure and response prevention (ERP) delivered by the therapist in weekly sessions, while self-help group received the manual with progress updates on a fortnightly basis, and control group received only pharmacotherapy. Outcome assessment was conducted postintervention at 15 weeks. Results: Both therapist-directed as well as SHM groups showed significant improvement from pre- to post-intervention while was not seen for the control group. No significant difference was seen in improvements for the groups using therapist-directed or SHM approach; however, both showed significantly greater improvement on Y-BOCS scores as compared to controls. Conclusion: SHMs produce improvements comparable to that of traditional therapist-directed approaches. The findings raise important implications for the use of manuals as adjuncts or independent therapy models.","PeriodicalId":31679,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health and Human Behaviour","volume":"24 1","pages":"104 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health and Human Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmhhb.jmhhb_38_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The past few decades have seen great strides in the field of psychotherapy. With the advancement in technology, alternative modes of therapy dissemination such as computers, telemental health, and manuals are being explored. Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) has increasingly come under the purview of these modes, particularly for the delivery of self-directed exposure and response prevention. The current study explores the effectiveness of self-help manuals (SHMs) in the management of OCD. Methods: The study employed a pre- and post-experimental design. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the three conditions (independent variable) – Therapist-directed Intervention, SHM, and Control Group. Outcome measures used (Dependent Variables) were symptom severity scores as assessed on Yale–Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Sixty participants between the ages of 15–45 years were screened and assigned to one of the three conditions. The therapist-directed group received exposure and response prevention (ERP) delivered by the therapist in weekly sessions, while self-help group received the manual with progress updates on a fortnightly basis, and control group received only pharmacotherapy. Outcome assessment was conducted postintervention at 15 weeks. Results: Both therapist-directed as well as SHM groups showed significant improvement from pre- to post-intervention while was not seen for the control group. No significant difference was seen in improvements for the groups using therapist-directed or SHM approach; however, both showed significantly greater improvement on Y-BOCS scores as compared to controls. Conclusion: SHMs produce improvements comparable to that of traditional therapist-directed approaches. The findings raise important implications for the use of manuals as adjuncts or independent therapy models.
使用自助手册管理强迫症:在印度背景下的有效性
背景:在过去的几十年里,心理治疗领域取得了长足的进步。随着技术的进步,正在探索其他治疗传播模式,如计算机、远程心理健康和手册。强迫症(OCD)越来越多地被纳入这些模式的范围,特别是在提供自我指导的暴露和反应预防方面。目前的研究探讨了自助手册在强迫症管理中的有效性。方法:本研究采用实验前后设计。参与者被随机分配到三种情况(自变量)中的一种——治疗师指导干预组、SHM组和对照组。使用的结果测量(因变量)是根据Yale-Brown强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)评估的症状严重程度评分。60名年龄在15-45岁之间的参与者接受了筛查,并被分配到三种情况中的一种。治疗师指导组每周接受治疗师提供的暴露和反应预防(ERP),而自助组每两周接受一次进度更新手册,对照组仅接受药物治疗。干预后15周进行结果评估。结果:治疗师指导组和SHM组从干预前到干预后都表现出显著的改善,而对照组则没有。使用治疗师指导或SHM方法的组在改善方面没有显著差异;然而,与对照组相比,两组患者的Y-BOCS评分均有显著提高。结论:SHM产生的改善与传统治疗师指导的方法相当。这些发现对手册作为辅助或独立治疗模型的使用提出了重要的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信