Upgrade of waste stabilization ponds to improve effluents for reuse purposes

IF 1.5 Q4 WATER RESOURCES
Jochen Sinn, S. Agrawal, L. Orschler, Selina Schubert, S. Lackner
{"title":"Upgrade of waste stabilization ponds to improve effluents for reuse purposes","authors":"Jochen Sinn, S. Agrawal, L. Orschler, Selina Schubert, S. Lackner","doi":"10.2166/h2oj.2023.063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Waste stabilization pond (WSP) systems exist in many countries affected by climate change causing increasing demand for irrigation water. There is little long-term experience with WSP in Africa, and thus, this study provides a comprehensive investigation of a WSP in Namibia. One of its treatment trains was upgraded with mechanical and anaerobic pre-treatment, and post-treatment and compared to a second train without upgrades. The pre-treatment showed positive results on COD, TSS and partially pathogen removal. E. coli were reduced to the new EU reuse standard of 1,000 MPN/100 mL for fodder irrigation, P. aeruginosa stagnated and Enterococci levels increased. The main pathogen reduction happened during pre-treatment and in the baffled facultative pond. In contrast, the post-treatment only reduced 5% of algae-based chlorophyll-a. Among the top 20 genera, Pseudomonas was most dominant. With different upgrades, hygiene requirements especially for restricted fodder irrigation can be reached. At the same time, high total tCOD and TN effluent values did not meet different reuse standards. But as the tCOD mainly consists of algae, adding biomass and TN fertilizer to the barren soil, it raised the question if all parameters set in the standards are applicable for WSP or should be adapted to their specific purpose.","PeriodicalId":36060,"journal":{"name":"H2Open Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"H2Open Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/h2oj.2023.063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Waste stabilization pond (WSP) systems exist in many countries affected by climate change causing increasing demand for irrigation water. There is little long-term experience with WSP in Africa, and thus, this study provides a comprehensive investigation of a WSP in Namibia. One of its treatment trains was upgraded with mechanical and anaerobic pre-treatment, and post-treatment and compared to a second train without upgrades. The pre-treatment showed positive results on COD, TSS and partially pathogen removal. E. coli were reduced to the new EU reuse standard of 1,000 MPN/100 mL for fodder irrigation, P. aeruginosa stagnated and Enterococci levels increased. The main pathogen reduction happened during pre-treatment and in the baffled facultative pond. In contrast, the post-treatment only reduced 5% of algae-based chlorophyll-a. Among the top 20 genera, Pseudomonas was most dominant. With different upgrades, hygiene requirements especially for restricted fodder irrigation can be reached. At the same time, high total tCOD and TN effluent values did not meet different reuse standards. But as the tCOD mainly consists of algae, adding biomass and TN fertilizer to the barren soil, it raised the question if all parameters set in the standards are applicable for WSP or should be adapted to their specific purpose.
升级废物稳定池,以改善废水以供再利用
受气候变化影响的许多国家都存在废物稳定池(WSP)系统,这导致对灌溉用水的需求增加。非洲很少有长期的WSP经验,因此,本研究对纳米比亚的WSP进行了全面调查。其中一列处理机组进行了机械和厌氧预处理和后处理升级,并与未升级的第二列进行了比较。预处理对COD、TSS和部分病原菌去除效果良好。大肠杆菌被降低到1000 MPN/100 mL的新欧盟再利用标准,用于饲料灌溉,铜绿假单胞菌停滞,肠球菌水平增加。主要病原菌减少发生在预处理和折流兼性池中。相比之下,后处理只减少了5%的藻类叶绿素a。在前20个属中,假单胞菌占优势。通过不同的升级,可以达到卫生要求,特别是对限制性饲料灌溉的卫生要求。同时,高的总tCOD和TN出水值不符合不同的再利用标准。但是,由于tCOD主要由藻类组成,向贫瘠的土壤中添加生物质和TN肥料,这就提出了一个问题,即标准中设定的所有参数是否适用于WSP,或者是否应该适应其特定目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
H2Open Journal
H2Open Journal Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信