Techniques for Retrieval of Lacerated Flexor Tendons: A Scoping Review.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Plastic surgery Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-05 DOI:10.1177/22925503221088841
Assaf Kadar, Shanny Gur, Haggai Schermann, Sorin D Iordache
{"title":"Techniques for Retrieval of Lacerated Flexor Tendons: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Assaf Kadar, Shanny Gur, Haggai Schermann, Sorin D Iordache","doi":"10.1177/22925503221088841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Flexor tendon laceration is often followed by retraction of the proximal stump. The goals of this review were to describe the myriad of proximal stump retrieval surgical techniques and where available to provide the clinical evidence associated with each. <b>Methods:</b> A Medline and Web of Science search was performed to identify any publication whose primary purpose was to describe a tendon retrieval technique. The techniques were assigned to 8 groups. Clinical outcomes, where reported, and advantages and disadvantages of the technique as reported by the authors of the articles were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> Eight-hundred and forty-one publications complied with the search terms, and 33 articles were included in the current analysis. Only 2 of these articles were randomized controlled trials, and they were of low quality. <b>Conclusion:</b> There is no high-quality evidence to allow quantitative comparison of tendon retrieval techniques. An incremental approach can be recommended based on the qualitative review. After failed atraumatic attempts to retrieve the tendon by milking, retrieval should be done through proximal incision at the A1 pulley level, preferably without pulling the tendon out of the wound. When available, using an endoscope to retrieve the tendon appears to be a promising alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10902468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503221088841","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Flexor tendon laceration is often followed by retraction of the proximal stump. The goals of this review were to describe the myriad of proximal stump retrieval surgical techniques and where available to provide the clinical evidence associated with each. Methods: A Medline and Web of Science search was performed to identify any publication whose primary purpose was to describe a tendon retrieval technique. The techniques were assigned to 8 groups. Clinical outcomes, where reported, and advantages and disadvantages of the technique as reported by the authors of the articles were analyzed. Results: Eight-hundred and forty-one publications complied with the search terms, and 33 articles were included in the current analysis. Only 2 of these articles were randomized controlled trials, and they were of low quality. Conclusion: There is no high-quality evidence to allow quantitative comparison of tendon retrieval techniques. An incremental approach can be recommended based on the qualitative review. After failed atraumatic attempts to retrieve the tendon by milking, retrieval should be done through proximal incision at the A1 pulley level, preferably without pulling the tendon out of the wound. When available, using an endoscope to retrieve the tendon appears to be a promising alternative.

屈肌腱撕裂伤的恢复技术:范围综述
引言:屈肌腱撕裂伤后通常会出现近端残端回缩。这篇综述的目的是描述无数的近端残端修复手术技术,并在可用的情况下提供与每种技术相关的临床证据。方法:进行Medline和Web of Science搜索,以确定任何主要目的是描述肌腱修复技术的出版物。将这些技术分为8组。分析了文章作者报告的临床结果以及该技术的优缺点。结果:八百四十一篇出版物符合搜索条件,33篇文章被纳入当前分析。这些文章中只有2篇是随机对照试验,质量较低。结论:没有高质量的证据可以对肌腱修复技术进行定量比较。可以在定性审查的基础上建议采取渐进式方法。在通过挤奶取回肌腱的无创伤尝试失败后,应通过A1滑轮水平的近端切口进行取回,最好不要将肌腱拉出伤口。如果可用,使用内窥镜取回肌腱似乎是一种很有前途的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plastic surgery
Plastic surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信