Comparison of Data Quality between PAPI and CAPI Modes of Data Collection in Longitudinal Household Surveys: RLMS–HSE Experiment Results

Q3 Social Sciences

Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal Pub Date : 2020-12-22 DOI:10.19181/socjour.2020.26.4.7640

A. Klimova, E. Terentev

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents the results of an experimental study on how the transition from PAPI to CAPI modes affected data quality in longitudinal household surveys. The study was conducted in 2018–2019 within the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS–HSE). In the previous paper, which was based on data from the 26th wave of the RLMS HSE, it was shown that the use of CAPI leads to a significant decrease in the rate of non-substantive responses (“Don’t know”), as well as significant differences in sensitive questions. This paper was aimed at verifying these findings using new data collected during the 27th wave of the RLMS–HSE. The results show that the use of CAPI leads to a decrease in the rate of non-substantive responses, which helps to improve data quality. However, it was shown that the use of CAPI could lead to an increase in social desirability bias.

查看原文本刊更多论文

纵向住户调查数据收集PAPI与CAPI模式的数据质量比较:RLMS-HSE实验结果

本文介绍了在纵向家庭调查中，从PAPI模式向CAPI模式的转变如何影响数据质量的实验研究结果。该研究于2018–2019年在俄罗斯纵向监测调查（RLMS–HSE）范围内进行。在之前的论文中，基于第26波RLMS HSE的数据，研究表明，CAPI的使用导致非实质性回复率（“不知道”）显著降低，敏感问题也存在显著差异。本文旨在使用第27波RLMS–HSE期间收集的新数据来验证这些发现。结果表明，CAPI的使用降低了非实质性答复的比率，这有助于提高数据质量。然而，研究表明，CAPI的使用可能会导致社会期望偏差的增加。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

37 weeks

期刊介绍： “Sotsiologicheskij Zhurnal” publishes the articles on sociological disciplines. Interdisciplinary studies in sociology and related disciplines, such as social psychology, cultural studies, anthropology, ethnography, etc. — are also welcomed. The main emphasis is on the fundamental research in the field of theory, methodology and history of sociology. The regular rubric highlights the results of mass surveys and case studies. The rubric “Discussion”, which debated the controversial issues of sociological research, is regular as well. The journal publishes book reviews, and summaries, as well as lists of new books in Russian and English, which represent the main areas of interdisciplinary research in the social sciences. The journal aims to not only play samples of knowledge, considered regulatory and standards of internal expertise in the professional community, but also aims for opportunities to improve them. These rules, a tough selection and decision to print only a small portion of incoming materials allow “Sotsiologicheskij Zhurnal” contribute to improving the quality of sociological research. Submitted manuscripts should show a high integrity in problem setting, problem analysis and correspond to the journal’s thematic profile and its scientific priorities.