The Role of Embodied Simulation and Visual Imagery in Emotional Contagion with Music

Q1 Arts and Humanities
J. Cespedes-Guevara, Nicola Dibben
{"title":"The Role of Embodied Simulation and Visual Imagery in Emotional Contagion with Music","authors":"J. Cespedes-Guevara, Nicola Dibben","doi":"10.1177/20592043221093836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emotional contagion has been explained as arising from embodied simulation. The two most accepted theories of music-induced emotions presume a mechanism of internal mimicry: the BRECVEMA framework proposes that the melodic aspect of music elicits internal mimicry leading to the induction of basic emotions in the listener, and the Multifactorial Process Model proposes that the observation or imagination of motor expressions of the musicians elicits muscular and neural mimicry, and emotional contagion. Two behavioral studies investigated whether, and to what extent, mimicry is responsible for emotion contagion, and second, to what extent context for affective responses in the form of visual imagery moderates emotional responses. Experiment 1 tested whether emotional contagion is influenced by mimicry by manipulating explicit vocal and motor mimicry. In one condition, participants engaged in mimicry of the melodic aspects of the music by singing along with the music, and in another, participants engaged in mimicry of the musician’s gestures when producing the music, by playing along (“air guitar”-style). The experiment did not find confirmatory evidence for either hypothesized simulation mechanism, but it did provide evidence of spontaneous visual imagery consistent with the induced and perceived emotions. Experiment 2 used imagined rather than performed mimicry, but found no association between imagined motor simulation and emotional intensity. Emotional descriptions read prior to hearing the music influenced the type of perceived and induced emotions and support the prediction that visual imagery and associated semantic knowledge shape listeners’ affective experiences with music. The lack of evidence for the causal role of embodied simulation suggests that current theorization of emotion contagion by music needs refinement to reduce the role of simulation relative to other mechanisms. Evidence for induction of affective states that can be modulated by contextual and semantic associations suggests a model of emotion induction consistent with constructionist accounts.","PeriodicalId":33047,"journal":{"name":"Music Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Music Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20592043221093836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Emotional contagion has been explained as arising from embodied simulation. The two most accepted theories of music-induced emotions presume a mechanism of internal mimicry: the BRECVEMA framework proposes that the melodic aspect of music elicits internal mimicry leading to the induction of basic emotions in the listener, and the Multifactorial Process Model proposes that the observation or imagination of motor expressions of the musicians elicits muscular and neural mimicry, and emotional contagion. Two behavioral studies investigated whether, and to what extent, mimicry is responsible for emotion contagion, and second, to what extent context for affective responses in the form of visual imagery moderates emotional responses. Experiment 1 tested whether emotional contagion is influenced by mimicry by manipulating explicit vocal and motor mimicry. In one condition, participants engaged in mimicry of the melodic aspects of the music by singing along with the music, and in another, participants engaged in mimicry of the musician’s gestures when producing the music, by playing along (“air guitar”-style). The experiment did not find confirmatory evidence for either hypothesized simulation mechanism, but it did provide evidence of spontaneous visual imagery consistent with the induced and perceived emotions. Experiment 2 used imagined rather than performed mimicry, but found no association between imagined motor simulation and emotional intensity. Emotional descriptions read prior to hearing the music influenced the type of perceived and induced emotions and support the prediction that visual imagery and associated semantic knowledge shape listeners’ affective experiences with music. The lack of evidence for the causal role of embodied simulation suggests that current theorization of emotion contagion by music needs refinement to reduce the role of simulation relative to other mechanisms. Evidence for induction of affective states that can be modulated by contextual and semantic associations suggests a model of emotion induction consistent with constructionist accounts.
具身模拟和视觉意象在音乐情绪传染中的作用
情绪传染被解释为产生于具身模拟。关于音乐诱发情绪的两种最被接受的理论假设了一种内部模仿机制:BRECVEMA框架提出,音乐的旋律方面引发了内部模仿,从而诱发了听者的基本情绪;多因子过程模型提出,对音乐家运动表达的观察或想象引发了肌肉和神经模仿,以及情绪传染。两项行为研究调查了模仿是否以及在多大程度上对情绪传染负责,第二,以视觉意象形式的情感反应的背景在多大程度上调节了情绪反应。实验1通过操纵显性的声音和动作模仿来测试情绪感染是否受到模仿的影响。在一种情况下,参与者通过随着音乐唱歌来模仿音乐的旋律方面,在另一种情况下,参与者在演奏音乐时通过演奏(“空气吉他”风格)来模仿音乐家的手势。实验没有发现任何一种假设模拟机制的确凿证据,但它确实提供了与诱导和感知情绪一致的自发视觉图像的证据。实验2使用想象而不是实际的模仿,但没有发现想象的运动模拟和情绪强度之间的联系。在听音乐之前阅读的情绪描述影响感知和诱发情绪的类型,并支持视觉意象和相关语义知识塑造听者对音乐的情感体验的预测。体现模拟的因果作用缺乏证据,这表明目前音乐传染情绪的理论需要改进,以减少模拟相对于其他机制的作用。情感状态诱导的证据可以通过语境和语义关联来调节,这表明了一种与建构主义观点一致的情感诱导模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Music  Science
Music Science Arts and Humanities-Music
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信