Creation Myth: The Imagining of the Gothic Imagination in the Diodati Triptych: Gothic (1986), Haunted Summer (1988), and Remando al viento (1988)

IF 0.2 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Harvey O'Brien
{"title":"Creation Myth: The Imagining of the Gothic Imagination in the Diodati Triptych: Gothic (1986), Haunted Summer (1988), and Remando al viento (1988)","authors":"Harvey O'Brien","doi":"10.3366/gothic.2022.0129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that amid the slasher carnage, three 1980s gothic films representing the literary imagination of Frankenstein attempted to proffer a vision of horror rooted in creation rather than death. In so doing they reinvigorate the radical roots of horror as a challenge to the status quo: a reconfiguration of life into forms which awaken fears as characters face precarious destinies haunted by their past. Ken Russell’s Gothic (1986), Ivan Passer’s Haunted Summer (1988), and Gonzalo Suárez’s Remando al viento / Rowing with the Wind (1988) all depict Mary Shelley facing personal and social challenges from her (male) peers including Percy Shelley, Lord Byron, and John Polidori. Arguably it is Mary who will in time emerge as an even more enduring literary voice, evinced by the fact of her being the protagonist of these films. During the Summer at Villa Diodati on the shores of Lake Geneva where each of these authors sought to create stories of horror, the films imagine the psychosexual power games and intellectual debates which surrounded these literary conjurations. All three films also depict an intrusion of the supernatural as Mary’s monster actually manifests in the liminal space between waking and dreaming. Though wildly different in tone and affect, all three films represent a Gothicism (or an adjacent Gothic allusion) distinct from either the nostalgic or the dismissive deployment of its tropes in other genre films at the time and in so doing raise questions about 1980s cinema and culture more broadly.","PeriodicalId":42443,"journal":{"name":"Gothic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gothic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/gothic.2022.0129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article argues that amid the slasher carnage, three 1980s gothic films representing the literary imagination of Frankenstein attempted to proffer a vision of horror rooted in creation rather than death. In so doing they reinvigorate the radical roots of horror as a challenge to the status quo: a reconfiguration of life into forms which awaken fears as characters face precarious destinies haunted by their past. Ken Russell’s Gothic (1986), Ivan Passer’s Haunted Summer (1988), and Gonzalo Suárez’s Remando al viento / Rowing with the Wind (1988) all depict Mary Shelley facing personal and social challenges from her (male) peers including Percy Shelley, Lord Byron, and John Polidori. Arguably it is Mary who will in time emerge as an even more enduring literary voice, evinced by the fact of her being the protagonist of these films. During the Summer at Villa Diodati on the shores of Lake Geneva where each of these authors sought to create stories of horror, the films imagine the psychosexual power games and intellectual debates which surrounded these literary conjurations. All three films also depict an intrusion of the supernatural as Mary’s monster actually manifests in the liminal space between waking and dreaming. Though wildly different in tone and affect, all three films represent a Gothicism (or an adjacent Gothic allusion) distinct from either the nostalgic or the dismissive deployment of its tropes in other genre films at the time and in so doing raise questions about 1980s cinema and culture more broadly.
迪奥达蒂三联画中的想象:《哥特》(1986)、《鬼夏》(1988)和《维也纳梦》(1988)
本文认为,在血腥的大屠杀中,三部代表弗兰肯斯坦文学想象力的20世纪80年代的哥特电影试图提供一种根植于创造而不是死亡的恐怖景象。在这样做的过程中,他们重新激活了恐怖的根本根源,作为对现状的挑战:当人物面对被过去困扰的不稳定命运时,生活的重新配置唤醒了恐惧。肯·罗素的《哥特》(1986)、伊万·帕塞的《鬼夏》(1988)和冈萨洛Suárez的《乘风而行》(1988)都描绘了玛丽·雪莱面对来自珀西·雪莱、拜伦勋爵和约翰·波利多里等(男性)同龄人的个人和社会挑战。可以说,随着时间的推移,玛丽将成为一个更持久的文学声音,她是这些电影的主角这一事实证明了这一点。在日内瓦湖岸边的迪奥达蒂别墅的夏天里,这些作家都试图创作恐怖故事,电影想象了围绕着这些文学幻想的性心理权力游戏和智力辩论。这三部电影也都描绘了超自然的入侵,就像玛丽的怪物实际上在清醒和做梦之间的阈限空间中表现出来一样。尽管在基调和情感上截然不同,但这三部电影都代表了一种哥特主义(或与之相邻的哥特影射),与当时其他类型电影中怀旧或不屑一顾的修辞截然不同,因此引发了更广泛的关于20世纪80年代电影和文化的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gothic Studies
Gothic Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Gothic Association considers the field of Gothic studies from the eighteenth century to the present day. Gothic Studies opens a forum for dialogue and cultural criticism, and provides a specialist journal for scholars working in a field which is today taught or researched in academic institutions around the globe. The journal invites contributions from scholars working within any period of the Gothic; interdisciplinary scholarship is especially welcome, as are studies of works across the range of media, beyond the written word.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信