Does a Clarke-Groves type tax prevent free riding when implementing Eurobonds?

IF 2.5 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
C. Contreras, Julio Angulo
{"title":"Does a Clarke-Groves type tax prevent free riding when implementing Eurobonds?","authors":"C. Contreras, Julio Angulo","doi":"10.1108/AEA-03-2020-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to propose a Clarke-Groves Tax (CGT) type as a remedy to the criticism that the implementation of Eurobonds has raised regarding the risk of undermining fiscal discipline. In this model, a government minimizes its sovereign debt-to-GDP ratio in a given period and decides whether to join a common sovereign debt club. In doing so, it exposes itself to a positive or negative tax burden while benefiting from the liquidity premium involved in creating a secure asset. The authors found that the introduction of this tax may prevent free riding behaviours if Eurobonds were to be implemented. To illustrate this, the authors provide some numerical simulations for the Eurozone.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn the model presented, a government which optimizes a social utility function decides whether to join the common debt club.\n\n\nFindings\nThe adoption of the proposed tax could prevent free-riding behaviours and, therefore, encourages participation by those countries with lower debt levels that would have not otherwise taken part in this common debt mechanism. Under certain circumstances, we can expect the utility of all members of this club to improve. The bias in the distribution of gains might be mitigated by regulating the tax rule determining the magnitude of payment/reward. The proportion of the liquidity premium, arising from the implementation of a sovereign safe asset, has a decisive impact on the degree of the governments’ utility enhancement.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe adoption of a CGT would require Eurobonds club members to reach an agreement on “the” theoretical model for determining the sovereign debt yield. One of the limitations of this model is considering the debt-to-GDP ratio as the sole determinant of public debt yields. Moreover, the authors assumed the relationship between the debt-to-GDP ratio and funding costs to be identical for all countries. Any progress in the implementation of the proposed transfer scheme would require a more realistic and in-depth analysis.\n\n\nPractical implications\nA new fiscal rule based on compensating countries with lower public debt levels could be a way to mitigate free-riding problems if a Eurobond mechanism is to be established.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis fiscal rule has not been proposed or analysed before in a context such as that considered by this paper.\n","PeriodicalId":36191,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Economic Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/AEA-03-2020-0020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose a Clarke-Groves Tax (CGT) type as a remedy to the criticism that the implementation of Eurobonds has raised regarding the risk of undermining fiscal discipline. In this model, a government minimizes its sovereign debt-to-GDP ratio in a given period and decides whether to join a common sovereign debt club. In doing so, it exposes itself to a positive or negative tax burden while benefiting from the liquidity premium involved in creating a secure asset. The authors found that the introduction of this tax may prevent free riding behaviours if Eurobonds were to be implemented. To illustrate this, the authors provide some numerical simulations for the Eurozone. Design/methodology/approach In the model presented, a government which optimizes a social utility function decides whether to join the common debt club. Findings The adoption of the proposed tax could prevent free-riding behaviours and, therefore, encourages participation by those countries with lower debt levels that would have not otherwise taken part in this common debt mechanism. Under certain circumstances, we can expect the utility of all members of this club to improve. The bias in the distribution of gains might be mitigated by regulating the tax rule determining the magnitude of payment/reward. The proportion of the liquidity premium, arising from the implementation of a sovereign safe asset, has a decisive impact on the degree of the governments’ utility enhancement. Research limitations/implications The adoption of a CGT would require Eurobonds club members to reach an agreement on “the” theoretical model for determining the sovereign debt yield. One of the limitations of this model is considering the debt-to-GDP ratio as the sole determinant of public debt yields. Moreover, the authors assumed the relationship between the debt-to-GDP ratio and funding costs to be identical for all countries. Any progress in the implementation of the proposed transfer scheme would require a more realistic and in-depth analysis. Practical implications A new fiscal rule based on compensating countries with lower public debt levels could be a way to mitigate free-riding problems if a Eurobond mechanism is to be established. Originality/value This fiscal rule has not been proposed or analysed before in a context such as that considered by this paper.
在实施欧洲债券时,克拉克-格罗夫斯式的税收能防止搭便车吗?
本文的目的是提出一个克拉克-格罗夫斯税(CGT)类型的补救批评,即欧元债券的实施已经提出了关于破坏财政纪律的风险。在该模型中,一国政府在给定时期内将其主权债务与gdp之比最小化,并决定是否加入共同主权债务俱乐部。在这样做的过程中,它将自己暴露在积极或消极的税收负担之下,同时从创造安全资产所涉及的流动性溢价中受益。作者发现,如果实施欧洲债券,引入这项税收可能会防止搭便车行为。为了说明这一点,作者提供了一些欧元区的数值模拟。设计/方法/途径在所提出的模型中,一个优化社会效用函数的政府决定是否加入共同债务俱乐部。采用拟议的税收可以防止搭便车的行为,因此鼓励那些债务水平较低的国家参与,否则这些国家将不会参加这一共同债务机制。在某些情况下,我们可以预期这个俱乐部所有成员的效用都会提高。通过规范决定支付/奖励数额的税收规则,可能会减轻收益分配中的偏见。实施主权安全资产所产生的流动性溢价比例对政府效用增强的程度具有决定性影响。研究局限/影响采用CGT将要求欧洲债券俱乐部成员国就确定主权债务收益率的“理论模型”达成一致。该模型的局限性之一是将债务与gdp之比视为公共债务收益率的唯一决定因素。此外,作者假设所有国家的债务与gdp比率和融资成本之间的关系是相同的。在执行拟议的转让办法方面取得任何进展都需要进行更现实和深入的分析。如果要建立欧元债券机制,以补偿公共债务水平较低的国家为基础的新财政规则可能是缓解搭便车问题的一种方式。原创性/价值这一财政规则之前从未在本文所考虑的背景下提出或分析过。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Economic Analysis
Applied Economic Analysis Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信