{"title":"An Anniversary and New Departure: Transactions, 1872–2022","authors":"E. Griffin","doi":"10.1017/S0080440122000123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 26 November 1872, members of the Royal Historical Society gathered for their annual meeting at the Scottish Corporation Hall, off Fleet Street, London. The Society was marking its fourth anniversary since formation, and was delighted to have recently received recognition ‘as “Royal” by Her Majesty the Queen’. A buoyant annual report described a year of ‘extraordinary’ growth and change, which included the election of 158 new Fellows and of a popular new president. The minutes of the meeting also drew attention to the Society’s recent and successful foray into the publishing sphere, noting the ‘general satisfaction with the first volume of the Society’s Transactions’ which had recently been circulated to the membership. This publication was not, strictly speaking, the first occasion on which scholarly papers read to the Society had been made available in print. It did, however, mark the beginning of a more ambitious and structured approach to the Society’s publishing programme. In an editorial preface by Charles Rogers, the Society’s founder and self-styled ‘historiographer’, volume 1 of the Transactions of the Royal Historical Society promised ‘the recovery, from recondite sources, of materials which might illustrate the less explored paths of national and provincial history’. The volume opened with an article by the Cork-based historian Louis de Vericour on ‘The Study of History’ which lamented the ‘absence of historical studies in British education’ and argued for the subject’s ‘dignity and pre-eminent utility ... as a regulator of the human mind and as a teacher of Christian morality’. Members’ warm reception of this first volume of Transactions, as recorded on 26 November 1872, led the Council to ‘recommend that a volume of Transactions should be printed annually’.","PeriodicalId":23231,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Royal Historical Society","volume":"32 1","pages":"1 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Royal Historical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080440122000123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
On 26 November 1872, members of the Royal Historical Society gathered for their annual meeting at the Scottish Corporation Hall, off Fleet Street, London. The Society was marking its fourth anniversary since formation, and was delighted to have recently received recognition ‘as “Royal” by Her Majesty the Queen’. A buoyant annual report described a year of ‘extraordinary’ growth and change, which included the election of 158 new Fellows and of a popular new president. The minutes of the meeting also drew attention to the Society’s recent and successful foray into the publishing sphere, noting the ‘general satisfaction with the first volume of the Society’s Transactions’ which had recently been circulated to the membership. This publication was not, strictly speaking, the first occasion on which scholarly papers read to the Society had been made available in print. It did, however, mark the beginning of a more ambitious and structured approach to the Society’s publishing programme. In an editorial preface by Charles Rogers, the Society’s founder and self-styled ‘historiographer’, volume 1 of the Transactions of the Royal Historical Society promised ‘the recovery, from recondite sources, of materials which might illustrate the less explored paths of national and provincial history’. The volume opened with an article by the Cork-based historian Louis de Vericour on ‘The Study of History’ which lamented the ‘absence of historical studies in British education’ and argued for the subject’s ‘dignity and pre-eminent utility ... as a regulator of the human mind and as a teacher of Christian morality’. Members’ warm reception of this first volume of Transactions, as recorded on 26 November 1872, led the Council to ‘recommend that a volume of Transactions should be printed annually’.
1872年11月26日,英国皇家历史学会成员聚集在伦敦舰队街附近的苏格兰公司大厅参加年会。该协会成立四周年,很高兴最近获得了女王陛下的“皇家”认可。一份乐观的年度报告描述了这一年“非凡”的增长和变化,其中包括158名新研究员和一位受欢迎的新总统的选举。会议记录还提请注意学会最近成功进军出版领域,并指出“对最近分发给会员的学会会刊第一卷普遍感到满意”。严格地说,这份出版物并不是第一次向学会宣读学术论文。然而,这确实标志着学会出版计划开始采取更雄心勃勃、更有条理的方法。在该学会创始人、自封的“历史学家”查尔斯·罗杰斯的编辑序言中,《皇家历史学会汇刊》第1卷承诺“从深奥的来源中回收可能说明较少探索的国家和省级历史道路的材料”。该卷以科克历史学家Louis de Vericour关于“历史研究”的一篇文章开篇,该文章哀叹“英国教育中缺乏历史研究”,并主张该学科的“尊严和卓越的实用性。。。作为人类思想的调节者和基督教道德的老师。成员们对1872年11月26日记录的第一卷《交易》表示热烈欢迎,因此理事会“建议每年印刷一卷《交易书》”。
期刊介绍:
The Royal Historical Society has published the highest quality scholarship in history for over 150 years. A subscription includes a substantial annual volume of the Society’s Transactions, which presents wide-ranging reports from the front lines of historical research by both senior and younger scholars, and two volumes from the Camden Fifth Series, which makes available to a wider audience valuable primary sources that have hitherto been available only in manuscript form.