Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Drainage of Abdominal Collections—An Analysis over 5 Years

IF 1.5 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Mădălina Stan-Ilie, O. Plotogea, E. Rînja, V. Şandru, A. Butuc, G. Gheorghe, C. Diaconu, Anca Monica Macovei Oprescu, B. Popa, Alexandru Scafa-Udriște, G. Constantinescu
{"title":"Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Drainage of Abdominal Collections—An Analysis over 5 Years","authors":"Mădălina Stan-Ilie, O. Plotogea, E. Rînja, V. Şandru, A. Butuc, G. Gheorghe, C. Diaconu, Anca Monica Macovei Oprescu, B. Popa, Alexandru Scafa-Udriște, G. Constantinescu","doi":"10.3390/gastroent12030035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Ultrasound-guided (US-guided) percutaneous drainage (PD) of abdominal collections represents the first-choice alternative to surgical intervention. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy and safety of PD of visceral and non-visceral abdominal collections by reviewing our personal experience over a period of 5 years. Material and methods. The present study included 66 patients who underwent PD under ultrasound guidance. We analyzed clinical variables (collection size, catheter diameter, collection type, microbiological analysis, antibiotic regimens) along with the outcomes of the procedure. Results. Visceral collections were predominant, encompassing 38 hepatic abscesses and 1 splenic hematoma. Microbiological analysis showed that the majority (54%) were monomicrobial. The most encountered pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. Technical success was achieved in all cases and clinical success was observed in 84.6% of the cases. No immediate procedural complications were detected. There were 6 patients who needed reinterventions, either by catheter replacement or by surgical treatment. The mortality rate was 4.5%, due to patients’ poor overall status and oncological comorbidities. Conclusions. Percutaneous drainage under ultrasound guidance is a safe and effective procedure in the management of abdominal collections.","PeriodicalId":43586,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Insights","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent12030035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction. Ultrasound-guided (US-guided) percutaneous drainage (PD) of abdominal collections represents the first-choice alternative to surgical intervention. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy and safety of PD of visceral and non-visceral abdominal collections by reviewing our personal experience over a period of 5 years. Material and methods. The present study included 66 patients who underwent PD under ultrasound guidance. We analyzed clinical variables (collection size, catheter diameter, collection type, microbiological analysis, antibiotic regimens) along with the outcomes of the procedure. Results. Visceral collections were predominant, encompassing 38 hepatic abscesses and 1 splenic hematoma. Microbiological analysis showed that the majority (54%) were monomicrobial. The most encountered pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. Technical success was achieved in all cases and clinical success was observed in 84.6% of the cases. No immediate procedural complications were detected. There were 6 patients who needed reinterventions, either by catheter replacement or by surgical treatment. The mortality rate was 4.5%, due to patients’ poor overall status and oncological comorbidities. Conclusions. Percutaneous drainage under ultrasound guidance is a safe and effective procedure in the management of abdominal collections.
超声引导下经皮腹腔积液引流术5年疗效分析
介绍超声引导(US引导)经皮腹腔引流(PD)是外科干预的首选选择。我们研究的目的是通过回顾我们5年来的个人经验,评估内脏和非内脏腹部收集的PD的有效性和安全性。材料和方法。本研究包括66名在超声引导下接受帕金森病治疗的患者。我们分析了临床变量(采集尺寸、导管直径、采集类型、微生物分析、抗生素方案)以及手术结果。后果主要为内脏集合,包括38例肝脓肿和1例脾血肿。微生物分析表明,大多数(54%)是单微生物。最常见的病原体是肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠杆菌。所有病例都取得了技术上的成功,84.6%的病例取得了临床成功。没有发现任何直接的手术并发症。有6名患者需要再次干预,要么通过导管置换,要么通过手术治疗。由于患者的整体状况不佳和肿瘤合并症,死亡率为4.5%。结论。超声引导下经皮穿刺引流是一种安全有效的腹部积液处理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastroenterology Insights
Gastroenterology Insights GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
35
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信