Between- and within-subject covariance perspectives matter for investigations into the relationship between single- and dual-tasking performance

Q2 Psychology
Christoph Naefgen , Christine Blech , Michael Kriechbaumer , Hilde Haider , Nilam Ram , Robert Gaschler
{"title":"Between- and within-subject covariance perspectives matter for investigations into the relationship between single- and dual-tasking performance","authors":"Christoph Naefgen ,&nbsp;Christine Blech ,&nbsp;Michael Kriechbaumer ,&nbsp;Hilde Haider ,&nbsp;Nilam Ram ,&nbsp;Robert Gaschler","doi":"10.1016/j.metip.2023.100110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We expand the usually cross-sectional perspective on dual-tasking performance to include both intra- and interpersonal variability, which should capture within-person dynamics and psychological processes better. Two simple tasks, first as single-, then as dual-tasks, were performed by 58 participants over 20 sessions. We found positive relationships between (1) single- and dual-tasking performance and (2) the dual-task component tasks both inter- and intrapersonally. Better single-taskers were better dual-taskers and better single-tasking sessions were better dual-tasking sessions. This implies shared capacities that covary both inter- and intraindividually. We conclude that taking intra- and interpersonal variability into account is a promising future perspective.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93338,"journal":{"name":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260123000012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We expand the usually cross-sectional perspective on dual-tasking performance to include both intra- and interpersonal variability, which should capture within-person dynamics and psychological processes better. Two simple tasks, first as single-, then as dual-tasks, were performed by 58 participants over 20 sessions. We found positive relationships between (1) single- and dual-tasking performance and (2) the dual-task component tasks both inter- and intrapersonally. Better single-taskers were better dual-taskers and better single-tasking sessions were better dual-tasking sessions. This implies shared capacities that covary both inter- and intraindividually. We conclude that taking intra- and interpersonal variability into account is a promising future perspective.

在调查单任务和双任务表现之间的关系时,被试之间和被试内部的协方差观点很重要
我们扩展了双任务表现的通常横截面视角,包括内部和人际变异性,这应该更好地捕捉人的动态和心理过程。两项简单的任务,首先是单一任务,然后是双重任务,由58名参与者在20个疗程中完成。我们发现(1)单任务和双任务绩效之间存在正相关关系,(2)双任务组件任务之间存在正相关关系。更好的单任务处理者比更好的双任务处理者,更好的单任务处理者比更好的双任务处理者。这意味着在个体之间和个体内部共同变化的共享能力。我们的结论是,考虑到内部和人际变异性是一个很有前途的未来前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Methods in Psychology (Online)
Methods in Psychology (Online) Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信