Conceptualising the therapeutic alliance: exploring the relevance of Bordin’s model for adults with intellectual disabilities

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
S. Cameron, James Swanton, D. Dagnan
{"title":"Conceptualising the therapeutic alliance: exploring the relevance of Bordin’s model for adults with intellectual disabilities","authors":"S. Cameron, James Swanton, D. Dagnan","doi":"10.1108/amhid-11-2019-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to explore the applicability of Bordin’s model of therapeutic alliance in talking therapies for people with intellectual disabilities.,People with intellectual disabilities and therapists in six therapy dyads were interviewed using a qualitative methodology. Data were analysed using thematic analysis to explore how people with learning disabilities constructed the dimensions of therapeutic alliance. Content analysis was then used to focus on therapy bond, therapy tasks and goals to explore the agreement on these dimensions between the therapist and client.,People with intellectual disabilities reported their experience of therapy in a way that initially validates the alliance dimensions of Bordin’s model. There was clear overlap within most dyads in the description of the characteristics of the bond, the tasks undertaken and the goals of therapy. Some therapists described additional goals based on their therapeutic model that were not clearly described by the client working with them.,This study is limited by only including six therapy dyads; however, the results suggest further research on the impact of therapy alliance and how goals and tasks are agreed would be valuable.,Very few studies have explicitly examined the client’s view of therapy alliance.","PeriodicalId":44693,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"14 1","pages":"169-179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/amhid-11-2019-0034","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/amhid-11-2019-0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This study aims to explore the applicability of Bordin’s model of therapeutic alliance in talking therapies for people with intellectual disabilities.,People with intellectual disabilities and therapists in six therapy dyads were interviewed using a qualitative methodology. Data were analysed using thematic analysis to explore how people with learning disabilities constructed the dimensions of therapeutic alliance. Content analysis was then used to focus on therapy bond, therapy tasks and goals to explore the agreement on these dimensions between the therapist and client.,People with intellectual disabilities reported their experience of therapy in a way that initially validates the alliance dimensions of Bordin’s model. There was clear overlap within most dyads in the description of the characteristics of the bond, the tasks undertaken and the goals of therapy. Some therapists described additional goals based on their therapeutic model that were not clearly described by the client working with them.,This study is limited by only including six therapy dyads; however, the results suggest further research on the impact of therapy alliance and how goals and tasks are agreed would be valuable.,Very few studies have explicitly examined the client’s view of therapy alliance.
概念化治疗联盟:探索Bordin模型对智力残疾成人的相关性
本研究旨在探讨Bordin治疗联盟模式在智障人士谈话治疗中的适用性。采用定性方法对六个治疗组的智障人士和治疗师进行了访谈。采用主题分析法对数据进行分析,探讨学习障碍患者如何构建治疗联盟的维度。然后使用内容分析来关注治疗纽带、治疗任务和目标,以探索治疗师和来访者在这些维度上的一致。智障人士报告他们的治疗经历的方式,最初验证了Bordin模型的联盟维度。在大多数二人组中,在描述这种关系的特征、所承担的任务和治疗的目标方面,有明显的重叠。一些治疗师根据他们的治疗模式描述了额外的目标,这些目标并没有被与他们一起工作的客户清楚地描述。本研究仅包括六个治疗组合;然而,结果表明,进一步研究治疗联盟的影响以及如何达成目标和任务将是有价值的。很少有研究明确地考察了来访者对治疗联盟的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信