Development Solutions of Riga City Local Geodetic Network

IF 0.5 Q4 PHYSICS, APPLIED
A. Celms, J. Kaminskis, J. Akmentins, I. Vārna
{"title":"Development Solutions of Riga City Local Geodetic Network","authors":"A. Celms, J. Kaminskis, J. Akmentins, I. Vārna","doi":"10.2478/lpts-2022-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Throughout the centuries, Riga has been the city with dynamic development. Its territory has unceasingly expanded, whereby previously unused territories have been urbanized. Managers of the city understood already at the end of 19th century that unified geodetic network had great importance in the development of the city. Since then, Riga’s local geodetic network has evolved with the city, several coordinate and height systems have been replaced, but the task has remained the same – to provide a flawless, homogeneous geodetic foundation for various surveying activities. In 2018, the development of the local geodetic network in several parts of the city was completed, whereby the problem arose – altitude values of surveyed terrain points determined by using the improved geodetic network did not coincide with altitude values determined using the GNSS method. Considering the above-mentioned problem, the objectives of this study were set: to plan and carry out control measurements of the improved local geodetic network in the vicinity of Grizinkalns, to provide analysis of the obtained results and recommendations for further development of a local geodetic network. The difference between the heights determined by the geometric levelling method and the heights determined by the GNSS method shall not exceed 2 mm. According to the GNSS method, using the quasi-geoid model LV’14 v2, the determined heights of the geodetic grid points differ from the given ones by 0.062 m on average. The differences are systematic. To overcome these differences, the quasi-geoid model needs to be refined.","PeriodicalId":43603,"journal":{"name":"Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences","volume":"59 1","pages":"83 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/lpts-2022-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Throughout the centuries, Riga has been the city with dynamic development. Its territory has unceasingly expanded, whereby previously unused territories have been urbanized. Managers of the city understood already at the end of 19th century that unified geodetic network had great importance in the development of the city. Since then, Riga’s local geodetic network has evolved with the city, several coordinate and height systems have been replaced, but the task has remained the same – to provide a flawless, homogeneous geodetic foundation for various surveying activities. In 2018, the development of the local geodetic network in several parts of the city was completed, whereby the problem arose – altitude values of surveyed terrain points determined by using the improved geodetic network did not coincide with altitude values determined using the GNSS method. Considering the above-mentioned problem, the objectives of this study were set: to plan and carry out control measurements of the improved local geodetic network in the vicinity of Grizinkalns, to provide analysis of the obtained results and recommendations for further development of a local geodetic network. The difference between the heights determined by the geometric levelling method and the heights determined by the GNSS method shall not exceed 2 mm. According to the GNSS method, using the quasi-geoid model LV’14 v2, the determined heights of the geodetic grid points differ from the given ones by 0.062 m on average. The differences are systematic. To overcome these differences, the quasi-geoid model needs to be refined.
里加市地方大地测量网的开发解决方案
摘要几个世纪以来,里加一直是一座充满活力发展的城市。它的领土不断扩大,以前未使用的领土被城市化了。19世纪末,城市管理者就已经认识到,统一的大地测量网对城市的发展具有重要意义。从那时起,里加的地方大地测量网络随着城市的发展而发展,几个坐标和高度系统被替换,但任务仍然不变——为各种测量活动提供完美、均匀的大地测量基础。2018年,该市多个地区的地方大地测量网络开发完成,由此出现了问题——使用改进的大地测量网络确定的测量地形点的海拔值与使用GNSS方法确定的海拔值不一致。考虑到上述问题,本研究的目标是:规划和实施Grizinkalns附近改进的局部大地测量网的控制测量,对获得的结果进行分析,并为进一步开发局部大地测量网络提供建议。几何水准测量法确定的高度与全球导航卫星系统方法确定的高度之间的差异不得超过2 mm。根据全球导航卫星体系方法,使用准大地水准面模型LV’14 v2,测地网格点的确定高度与给定高度平均相差0.062 m。差异是系统性的。为了克服这些差异,需要对拟大地水准面模型进行改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
41
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences (Latvijas Fizikas un Tehnisko Zinātņu Žurnāls) publishes experimental and theoretical papers containing results not published previously and review articles. Its scope includes Energy and Power, Energy Engineering, Energy Policy and Economics, Physical Sciences, Physics and Applied Physics in Engineering, Astronomy and Spectroscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信