{"title":"Ideas and party change: the role of predistribution in labour’s ideological renewal","authors":"E. Goes","doi":"10.1080/13569317.2021.1894698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The literature on political parties and ideologies tends to highlight the instrumental nature of that relationship. In those accounts, political parties are either constrained by ideology or they use ideology to fit their power-seeking strategies. But there is a third dimension in this relationship that has been overlooked and which reveals key and interesting insights about how political parties contribute to the production of ideologies. This article seeks to contribute to the growing literature on the relationship between political parties and ideologies by proposing a new methodological approach, which combines V. A. Schmidt’s discursive institutionalism and Peter A. Hall’s historical institutionalism, to study how political parties engage in processes of ideological production. This methodological approach, is applied to the analysis of how the idea of ‘predistribution’ shaped party change in the Labour Party under Ed Miliband, shows: a) how political parties use ideas to make sense of the world and to address specific political challenges they face; b) how political parties link zeitgeist ideas to their own ideological traditions; c) how parties try to renew ideological traditions whilst pursuing other goals.","PeriodicalId":47036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Ideologies","volume":"26 1","pages":"180 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13569317.2021.1894698","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Ideologies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2021.1894698","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT The literature on political parties and ideologies tends to highlight the instrumental nature of that relationship. In those accounts, political parties are either constrained by ideology or they use ideology to fit their power-seeking strategies. But there is a third dimension in this relationship that has been overlooked and which reveals key and interesting insights about how political parties contribute to the production of ideologies. This article seeks to contribute to the growing literature on the relationship between political parties and ideologies by proposing a new methodological approach, which combines V. A. Schmidt’s discursive institutionalism and Peter A. Hall’s historical institutionalism, to study how political parties engage in processes of ideological production. This methodological approach, is applied to the analysis of how the idea of ‘predistribution’ shaped party change in the Labour Party under Ed Miliband, shows: a) how political parties use ideas to make sense of the world and to address specific political challenges they face; b) how political parties link zeitgeist ideas to their own ideological traditions; c) how parties try to renew ideological traditions whilst pursuing other goals.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Political Ideologies is dedicated to the analysis of political ideology both in its theoretical and conceptual aspects, and with reference to the nature and roles of concrete ideological manifestations and practices. The journal serves as a major discipline-developing vehicle for an innovative, growing and vital field in political studies, exploring new methodologies and illuminating the complexity and richness of ideological structures and solutions that form, and are formed by, political thinking and political imagination. Concurrently, the journal supports a broad research agenda aimed at building inter-disciplinary bridges with relevant areas and invigorating cross-disciplinary debate.