Efficiency of the Use of Materials of Concrete Block against Rubble Stone on Shallow Foundation Works

S. Winarno, Hari Nuryanto, M. Teguh
{"title":"Efficiency of the Use of Materials of Concrete Block against Rubble Stone on Shallow Foundation Works","authors":"S. Winarno, Hari Nuryanto, M. Teguh","doi":"10.14710/mkts.v28i1.37541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shallow foundation work with rubble stone material has several weaknesses, such as surface and shape irregularity and scarcity in a certain location. These weaknesses can be avoided through the use of concrete block material as a positive contribution for this research. This article provides the efficiency in the use of concrete blocks instead of rubble stones in shallow foundation work, by highlighting work productivity and total cost of work for both materials. Data is collected on a wall fence foundation work which implemented both materials successfully in Grogolan, Umbulmartani, Ngemplak, Sleman Yogyakarta Province. This research has revealed that the average productivity on concrete blocks and rubble stones is 0.799 m3/h and 0.590 m3/h respectively, in which there is a time efficiency that concrete block construction is 35,44% faster than that of rubble stone. Total cost of concrete block will be more expensive than rubble stone if the work volume is small, nevertheless it reaches a break-even-point at work volume of 11 m3, meaning that a cost efficiency of concrete block construction occurs if the work volume is more than 11 m3. Moreover, the implementation of concrete block has 4 intangible benefits i.e. saving space usage, minimum waste, ease of work, and more precise product.","PeriodicalId":31880,"journal":{"name":"Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/mkts.v28i1.37541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shallow foundation work with rubble stone material has several weaknesses, such as surface and shape irregularity and scarcity in a certain location. These weaknesses can be avoided through the use of concrete block material as a positive contribution for this research. This article provides the efficiency in the use of concrete blocks instead of rubble stones in shallow foundation work, by highlighting work productivity and total cost of work for both materials. Data is collected on a wall fence foundation work which implemented both materials successfully in Grogolan, Umbulmartani, Ngemplak, Sleman Yogyakarta Province. This research has revealed that the average productivity on concrete blocks and rubble stones is 0.799 m3/h and 0.590 m3/h respectively, in which there is a time efficiency that concrete block construction is 35,44% faster than that of rubble stone. Total cost of concrete block will be more expensive than rubble stone if the work volume is small, nevertheless it reaches a break-even-point at work volume of 11 m3, meaning that a cost efficiency of concrete block construction occurs if the work volume is more than 11 m3. Moreover, the implementation of concrete block has 4 intangible benefits i.e. saving space usage, minimum waste, ease of work, and more precise product.
浅基础工程中混凝土块石材料的使用效率
碎石类材料的浅基础施工存在着表面形状不规则、局部稀缺等缺点。这些缺点可以通过使用混凝土砌块材料作为本研究的积极贡献来避免。本文通过突出两种材料的工作效率和总工作成本,提供了在浅基础工程中使用混凝土块而不是碎石的效率。在日惹省的Grogolan、Umbulmartani、Ngemplak、Sleman成功实施了这两种材料的围墙围栏基础工作中收集了数据。研究表明,混凝土砌块和碎石的平均生产率分别为0.799 m3/h和0.590 m3/h,其中混凝土砌块施工的时间效率比碎石施工快35.44%。在工程量较小的情况下,混凝土砌块的总成本会比碎石贵,但在工程量为11 m3时达到盈亏平衡点,即当工程量大于11 m3时,混凝土砌块施工就会出现成本效益。此外,混凝土砌块的实施有4个无形的好处,即节省空间使用,减少浪费,工作方便,产品更精确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书