Machado de Assis and Milton: Possible Dialogues

IF 0.1 2区 文学 0 POETRY
M. Mansur
{"title":"Machado de Assis and Milton: Possible Dialogues","authors":"M. Mansur","doi":"10.1353/MLT.2017.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In There’s No Such Thing as Free Speech . . . and It’s a Good Thing Too (1994), Stanley Fish observes that “the Miltonic corpus, rather than being autonomous, is intertextual, the product of not a single voice but of multiple voices,” and that “we are already blessed (if that is the word) by studies of Milton and Virgil, Milton and Plato, Milton and the pastoral, Milton and warfare, Milton and science, Milton and opera . . . and on and on and on.”1 His argument suggests an exhaustion of Milton studies that many other critics may have felt at that time. Fish’s position in the 1990s was that there were “no new directions in Milton studies.” One underexplored direction, however, is south, for the subject of Milton and South American voices has not been part of the larger conversation. International literary criticism rightly refers to Milton’s presence as a major figure in English, German, and French Romanticism; this point is also true for Brazilian Romanticism, even though the reception of the English poet and his oeuvre in Brazil cannot be considered to be widespread at this time.2 One prominent contributor to Milton’s pan-American reputation is Brazil’s most widely read and studied writer, Joaquim Maria","PeriodicalId":42710,"journal":{"name":"Milton Studies","volume":"58 1","pages":"167 - 182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/MLT.2017.0009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milton Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/MLT.2017.0009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In There’s No Such Thing as Free Speech . . . and It’s a Good Thing Too (1994), Stanley Fish observes that “the Miltonic corpus, rather than being autonomous, is intertextual, the product of not a single voice but of multiple voices,” and that “we are already blessed (if that is the word) by studies of Milton and Virgil, Milton and Plato, Milton and the pastoral, Milton and warfare, Milton and science, Milton and opera . . . and on and on and on.”1 His argument suggests an exhaustion of Milton studies that many other critics may have felt at that time. Fish’s position in the 1990s was that there were “no new directions in Milton studies.” One underexplored direction, however, is south, for the subject of Milton and South American voices has not been part of the larger conversation. International literary criticism rightly refers to Milton’s presence as a major figure in English, German, and French Romanticism; this point is also true for Brazilian Romanticism, even though the reception of the English poet and his oeuvre in Brazil cannot be considered to be widespread at this time.2 One prominent contributor to Milton’s pan-American reputation is Brazil’s most widely read and studied writer, Joaquim Maria
马查多·德·阿西斯和米尔顿:可能的对话
在《没有言论自由这回事》中…在《这也是一件好事》(1994)中,斯坦利·费什观察到“弥尔顿语料库,而不是独立的,是互文的,不是单一声音的产物,而是多种声音的产物”,并且“我们已经被弥尔顿和维吉尔、弥尔顿和柏拉图、弥尔顿和田园、弥尔顿和战争、弥尔顿和科学、弥尔顿和歌剧的研究祝福了(如果可以这么说的话)。”等等等等。他的论点表明,弥尔顿的研究已经疲惫不堪,这可能是当时许多其他评论家所感受到的。费什在20世纪90年代的立场是,“弥尔顿研究没有新的方向”。然而,一个未被充分探索的方向是南方,因为弥尔顿和南美声音的主题并没有成为更广泛的对话的一部分。国际文学批评认为弥尔顿是英国,德国和法国浪漫主义的重要人物;巴西的浪漫主义也是如此,尽管当时巴西对这位英国诗人及其作品的接受程度并不普遍弥尔顿在美洲享有盛名的一个重要贡献者是巴西最受欢迎和研究的作家若阿金·玛丽亚
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Milton Studies
Milton Studies POETRY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Milton Studies is published annually by the University of Pittsburgh Press as a forum for Milton scholarship and criticism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信