Using Electronic Health Record Data to Support Research and Quality Improvement: Practical Guidance from a Qualitative Investigation

ACI open Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1713421
R. Wasserman, Daria F. Ferro
{"title":"Using Electronic Health Record Data to Support Research and Quality Improvement: Practical Guidance from a Qualitative Investigation","authors":"R. Wasserman, Daria F. Ferro","doi":"10.1055/s-0040-1713421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective The aim of the study is to identify how academic health centers (AHCs) have established infrastructures to leverage electronic health record (EHR) data to support research and quality improvement (QI). Methods Phone interviews of 18 clinical informaticians with expertise gained over three decades at 24 AHCs were transcribed for qualitative analysis on three levels. In Level I, investigators independently used NVivo software to code and identify themes expressed in the transcripts. In Level II, investigators reexamined coded transcripts and notes and contextualized themes in the learning health system paradigm. In Level III, an informant subsample validated and supplemented findings. Results Level I analysis yielded six key “determinants”—Institutional Relationships, Resource Availability, Data Strategy, Response to Change, Leadership Support, and Degree of Mission Alignment—which, according to local context, affect use of EHR data for research and QI. Level II analysis contextualized these determinants in a practical frame of reference, yielding a model of learning health system maturation, over-arching key concepts, and self-assessment questions to guide AHC progress toward becoming a learning health system. Level III informants validated and supplemented findings. Discussion Drawn from the collective knowledge of experienced informatics professionals, the findings and tools described offer practical support to help clinical informaticians leverage EHR data for research and QI in AHCs. Conclusion The learning health system model builds on the tripartite AHC mission of research, education, and patient care. AHCs must deliberately transform into learning health systems to capitalize fully on EHR data as a staple of health learning.","PeriodicalId":72041,"journal":{"name":"ACI open","volume":"04 1","pages":"e91 - e101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0040-1713421","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACI open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1713421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Objective The aim of the study is to identify how academic health centers (AHCs) have established infrastructures to leverage electronic health record (EHR) data to support research and quality improvement (QI). Methods Phone interviews of 18 clinical informaticians with expertise gained over three decades at 24 AHCs were transcribed for qualitative analysis on three levels. In Level I, investigators independently used NVivo software to code and identify themes expressed in the transcripts. In Level II, investigators reexamined coded transcripts and notes and contextualized themes in the learning health system paradigm. In Level III, an informant subsample validated and supplemented findings. Results Level I analysis yielded six key “determinants”—Institutional Relationships, Resource Availability, Data Strategy, Response to Change, Leadership Support, and Degree of Mission Alignment—which, according to local context, affect use of EHR data for research and QI. Level II analysis contextualized these determinants in a practical frame of reference, yielding a model of learning health system maturation, over-arching key concepts, and self-assessment questions to guide AHC progress toward becoming a learning health system. Level III informants validated and supplemented findings. Discussion Drawn from the collective knowledge of experienced informatics professionals, the findings and tools described offer practical support to help clinical informaticians leverage EHR data for research and QI in AHCs. Conclusion The learning health system model builds on the tripartite AHC mission of research, education, and patient care. AHCs must deliberately transform into learning health systems to capitalize fully on EHR data as a staple of health learning.
使用电子健康记录数据支持研究和质量改进:定性调查的实践指导
摘要目的本研究的目的是确定学术卫生中心(AHCs)如何建立基础设施来利用电子健康记录(EHR)数据来支持研究和质量改进(QI)。方法对24家ahc的18名临床信息学专家进行电话访谈,从三个层面进行定性分析。在第一阶段,研究者独立使用NVivo软件对转录本中表达的主题进行编码和识别。在第二阶段,研究者在学习卫生系统范式中重新检查编码转录本和笔记以及情境化主题。在第三级中,举报者子样本验证并补充了研究结果。一级分析产生了六个关键的“决定因素”——机构关系、资源可用性、数据策略、对变化的响应、领导支持和任务一致性程度——根据当地情况,这些因素会影响EHR数据在研究和QI中的使用。二级分析将这些决定因素置于实际参考框架中,得出学习型卫生系统成熟模型、总体关键概念和自我评估问题,以指导AHC朝着学习型卫生系统的方向发展。三级举报人证实并补充了调查结果。从经验丰富的信息学专业人员的集体知识中汲取,所描述的发现和工具为帮助临床信息学家利用电子病历数据进行ahc的研究和QI提供了实际支持。结论学习型卫生系统模式建立在AHC研究、教育和患者护理三方使命的基础上。AHCs必须有意识地转变为学习型卫生系统,充分利用电子病历数据作为卫生学习的主要内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书