Does inclusion save us all?

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION
H. Schaeffer, K. Tamminga
{"title":"Does inclusion save us all?","authors":"H. Schaeffer, K. Tamminga","doi":"10.1080/1474225X.2022.2049502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Based on qualitative research, this article reflects on how academic theology might contribute to practising inclusion as taking part in God’s salvific actions. After an overview of the disability-discourse in theology, and presenting some empirical findings, we conclude that theological discourse is a reflective practice in response to God’s salvific actions. Theologies of disability must, therefore, be practice-driven and invest in theological reflection. Furthermore, we scrutinise this practice-driven approach by analysing the discourse of ‘practice’ within qualitative research. Here, as well as in the theological discourse, the inclusive practice of reflection is brought to the fore. We conclude by pointing at the concrete sites of such inclusive reflection: local church communities that live out their calling to be transformative. Theologies of disability should be intimately connected to and informed by concrete church practices, while continuously keeping a critical conversation going to challenge those practices.","PeriodicalId":42198,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church","volume":"22 1","pages":"5 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1474225X.2022.2049502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Based on qualitative research, this article reflects on how academic theology might contribute to practising inclusion as taking part in God’s salvific actions. After an overview of the disability-discourse in theology, and presenting some empirical findings, we conclude that theological discourse is a reflective practice in response to God’s salvific actions. Theologies of disability must, therefore, be practice-driven and invest in theological reflection. Furthermore, we scrutinise this practice-driven approach by analysing the discourse of ‘practice’ within qualitative research. Here, as well as in the theological discourse, the inclusive practice of reflection is brought to the fore. We conclude by pointing at the concrete sites of such inclusive reflection: local church communities that live out their calling to be transformative. Theologies of disability should be intimately connected to and informed by concrete church practices, while continuously keeping a critical conversation going to challenge those practices.
包容能拯救我们所有人吗?
本文以质性研究为基础,反思学术神学如何有助于实践包容,参与上帝的救赎行动。通过对神学中残障话语的概述和实证研究,我们认为神学话语是对上帝救赎行动的一种反思性实践。因此,残疾神学必须是实践驱动的,并投资于神学反思。此外,我们通过分析定性研究中的“实践”话语来审视这种实践驱动的方法。在这里,以及在神学话语中,反思的包容性实践被带到了前台。最后,我们指出了这种包容性反思的具体地点:当地教会社区,他们活出了变革的呼召。残疾神学应该与具体的教会实践密切相关,并通过这些实践获得信息,同时不断保持对这些实践提出挑战的批判性对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信