João Paulo Oliveira Lucena, Josué Vitor De Medeiros Júnior, Maria Cristina Araújo De Oliveira
{"title":"Governança de projetos na administração pública: uma revisão sistemática da literatura internacional","authors":"João Paulo Oliveira Lucena, Josué Vitor De Medeiros Júnior, Maria Cristina Araújo De Oliveira","doi":"10.5585/GEP.V12I2.18527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this systematic review was to verify existing studies on project governance in public administration. To this end, an adaptation of the Tranfield, Denyer e Smart (2003) protocol was used to guide the execution of the review, originally with three stages and nine phases. The data were collected in two international databases, Scopus and Web of Sience. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with the aid of the EndNote ® software, a sample of 13 studies was analyzed. A general characterization of these publications was carried out, in which the journals where these works were published, authors, Qualis CAPES, year of publication and form of approach are presented. Afterwards, an analysis of these works was carried out in such a way that seven main research themes were found: governance-management interface, ownership, governance structures, governance practices, quality guarantees, performance and contractual-relational governance interaction. The main contribution of this work was to have checked the state of the art on the theme and emphasized that, although this theme is not incipient, the production on it is still scarce and that there is a vast field for exploration.","PeriodicalId":42575,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Gestao e Projetos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Gestao e Projetos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5585/GEP.V12I2.18527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The objective of this systematic review was to verify existing studies on project governance in public administration. To this end, an adaptation of the Tranfield, Denyer e Smart (2003) protocol was used to guide the execution of the review, originally with three stages and nine phases. The data were collected in two international databases, Scopus and Web of Sience. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with the aid of the EndNote ® software, a sample of 13 studies was analyzed. A general characterization of these publications was carried out, in which the journals where these works were published, authors, Qualis CAPES, year of publication and form of approach are presented. Afterwards, an analysis of these works was carried out in such a way that seven main research themes were found: governance-management interface, ownership, governance structures, governance practices, quality guarantees, performance and contractual-relational governance interaction. The main contribution of this work was to have checked the state of the art on the theme and emphasized that, although this theme is not incipient, the production on it is still scarce and that there is a vast field for exploration.
这项系统审查的目的是验证现有的关于公共行政项目治理的研究。为此,对Tranfield,Denyer e Smart(2003)协议进行了改编,用于指导审查的执行,最初分为三个阶段和九个阶段。数据收集在Scopus和Web of Sience两个国际数据库中。在应用纳入和排除标准后,借助EndNote®软件,对13项研究的样本进行了分析。对这些出版物进行了总体描述,其中介绍了这些作品发表的期刊、作者、Qualis CAPES、出版年份和方法形式。然后,对这些工作进行了分析,发现了七个主要的研究主题:治理管理界面、所有权、治理结构、治理实践、质量保证、绩效和契约关系治理互动。这件作品的主要贡献是检查了这个主题的艺术状态,并强调,尽管这个主题还没有起步,但它的制作仍然很少,而且有广阔的探索领域。