Insights about the Ethical and Moral State of Advertising Practitioners

IF 4.2 Q2 BUSINESS
Pamela A. Richardson-Greenfield, Carrie La Ferle
{"title":"Insights about the Ethical and Moral State of Advertising Practitioners","authors":"Pamela A. Richardson-Greenfield, Carrie La Ferle","doi":"10.1080/10641734.2020.1780998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The study examines how industry professionals perceive, process, and approach ethics in advertising. Thirty-four in-depth interviews with advertising practitioners were undertaken to assess the type of ethical considerations experienced by professionals today. Deceptive advertising was selected for a shared context in assessing level and process of ethical reasoning. Two scholarly frameworks focusing on cognitive moral development and ethical decision making were used to provide structure to the research. Participants expressed a general concern for deceptive advertising and converged on conceptual definitions. However, none had formal ethics-based training to equip them to recognize and avoid deceptive advertising, and most viewed deceptive advertising in terms of legal—not ethical or social—constraints and consequences. Comparisons with prior research indicate similar patterns in relation to experiencing Moral Myopia and practitioners operating outside the ‘Principled’ level of ethical concern from the cognitive moral development framework, but new and different areas also surfaced. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":43045,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Issues and Research In Advertising","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10641734.2020.1780998","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Issues and Research In Advertising","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2020.1780998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract The study examines how industry professionals perceive, process, and approach ethics in advertising. Thirty-four in-depth interviews with advertising practitioners were undertaken to assess the type of ethical considerations experienced by professionals today. Deceptive advertising was selected for a shared context in assessing level and process of ethical reasoning. Two scholarly frameworks focusing on cognitive moral development and ethical decision making were used to provide structure to the research. Participants expressed a general concern for deceptive advertising and converged on conceptual definitions. However, none had formal ethics-based training to equip them to recognize and avoid deceptive advertising, and most viewed deceptive advertising in terms of legal—not ethical or social—constraints and consequences. Comparisons with prior research indicate similar patterns in relation to experiencing Moral Myopia and practitioners operating outside the ‘Principled’ level of ethical concern from the cognitive moral development framework, but new and different areas also surfaced. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.
关于广告从业者的伦理和道德状况的见解
摘要:本研究考察了行业专业人士如何感知、处理和接近广告伦理。对34位广告从业人员进行了深入访谈,以评估当今专业人员所经历的道德考虑类型。在评估道德推理水平和过程的共同背景下,选择了欺骗性广告。两个专注于认知道德发展和伦理决策的学术框架被用来为研究提供结构。与会者对欺骗性广告表示普遍关切,并就概念定义达成一致。然而,没有人接受过正式的道德培训,使他们能够识别和避免欺骗性广告,而且大多数人从法律(而不是道德或社会)的限制和后果的角度来看待欺骗性广告。与先前研究的比较表明,在认知道德发展框架中,经历道德近视和从业者在“原则”伦理关注层面之外操作的模式相似,但也出现了新的和不同的领域。讨论了理论和管理意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
32.40%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信