{"title":"Animal Welfare and Covid-19 in Indonesia: A Neglected Legal Issue","authors":"Myrna Asnawati Safitri, Firman Firman","doi":"10.20956/HALREV.V7I1.2502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Covid-19 pandemic currently infecting the world population comes from the Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) transmitted initially from animals to humans, then between humans. This disease is referred to as zoonosis. Covid-19 discourse is generally about zoonotic transmission from animals to humans. Not much attention has been given to the potential transmission from humans to animals. In several countries, cases indicating the exposures of animals with the Coronavirus have been found. Thus, a discussion on the vulnerability of exposure to animals with the Coronavirus is significant to scientifically discussed. Unfortunately, concerns about this problem are still voiced by the mass media. Limited studies have been found, especially in Legal Science. In Indonesia, the Covid-19 incidence has hit more than 200 thousand people, one of the highest in Southeast Asia. Nevertheless, animal protection policy is not part of the national program of Covid-19 Control. Indonesia has several laws and regulations concerning animal welfare and zoonosis control. This article presents our study's findings investigating how the animal welfare law is applicable to protect the animals from Covid-19. Using the method of normative legal analysis, we found several weaknesses in the legal norms. We also observed how the ethics of anthropocentrism and ecocentrism compete in animal welfare laws. © 2021 HALREV. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":30743,"journal":{"name":"Hasanuddin Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hasanuddin Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20956/HALREV.V7I1.2502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
印度尼西亚的动物福利和Covid-19:一个被忽视的法律问题
目前感染世界人口的Covid-19大流行来自冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2),最初从动物传播给人类,然后在人与人之间传播。这种疾病被称为人畜共患病。Covid-19话语通常是关于动物向人类的人畜共患传播。人们对从人类到动物的潜在传播没有给予太多关注。在一些国家,已经发现了表明动物接触冠状病毒的病例。因此,讨论接触感染冠状病毒的动物的脆弱性对科学讨论具有重要意义。不幸的是,大众媒体仍然在表达对这个问题的关注。在这方面的研究有限,尤其是在法学方面。在印度尼西亚,新冠肺炎发病率已超过20万人,是东南亚最高的国家之一。然而,动物保护政策并不属于国家Covid-19控制计划的一部分。印度尼西亚有几项关于动物福利和人畜共患病控制的法律和法规。本文介绍了我们的研究结果,调查了动物福利法如何适用于保护动物免受Covid-19的侵害。运用规范性法律分析的方法,我们发现了法律规范的几个不足之处。我们还观察了人类中心主义和生态中心主义在动物福利法中的伦理竞争。©2021 halrev。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。