Examining the Role of Deception on Employees’ Threat Appraisal Process, Coping Appraisal Process and Unethical Behavior in Organization

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS
Etikonomi Pub Date : 2021-02-22 DOI:10.15408/ETK.V20I1.15433
Taslima Jannat, N. Omar, Syed Shah Alam
{"title":"Examining the Role of Deception on Employees’ Threat Appraisal Process, Coping Appraisal Process and Unethical Behavior in Organization","authors":"Taslima Jannat, N. Omar, Syed Shah Alam","doi":"10.15408/ETK.V20I1.15433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to examine whether deception influences unethical behavior, employee perceptions of threat, and their coping appraisal processes. It also examines the role of deception in influencing employees' threat appraisal and coping appraisal processing. Using the structural equation model (PLS-SEM), this study reveals a strong relationship between deception, unethical behavior, employees' perceived threat appraisal process, and the coping appraisal process. The empirical findings suggest that deception is a common practice in organizations and significantly influences unethical behavior. This study also finds that deception plays a crucial role in reducing employees' perceptions of threat regarding negative outcomes for engaging in unethical behavior while significantly influencing employees' perceived coping appraisal process, which suggests that deceptive behavior can protect them from the threat of detection their unethical behavior. The findings provide new insights into the relationship among deception, employees' perceived threat appraisal process, coping appraisal process, and unethical behavior and paves the way for further research in this area. JEL Classification:  L3, M1, M10, M14, M48 How to Cite: Jannat, T., Omar, N. A., & Alam, S. H. (2021). Is Deception an Antecedent for Employees’ Cognitive Appraisal Proceses and Unethical Behavior?. Etikonomi , 20 (1), 153 – 168. https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v20i1.15433.","PeriodicalId":41552,"journal":{"name":"Etikonomi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etikonomi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/ETK.V20I1.15433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine whether deception influences unethical behavior, employee perceptions of threat, and their coping appraisal processes. It also examines the role of deception in influencing employees' threat appraisal and coping appraisal processing. Using the structural equation model (PLS-SEM), this study reveals a strong relationship between deception, unethical behavior, employees' perceived threat appraisal process, and the coping appraisal process. The empirical findings suggest that deception is a common practice in organizations and significantly influences unethical behavior. This study also finds that deception plays a crucial role in reducing employees' perceptions of threat regarding negative outcomes for engaging in unethical behavior while significantly influencing employees' perceived coping appraisal process, which suggests that deceptive behavior can protect them from the threat of detection their unethical behavior. The findings provide new insights into the relationship among deception, employees' perceived threat appraisal process, coping appraisal process, and unethical behavior and paves the way for further research in this area. JEL Classification:  L3, M1, M10, M14, M48 How to Cite: Jannat, T., Omar, N. A., & Alam, S. H. (2021). Is Deception an Antecedent for Employees’ Cognitive Appraisal Proceses and Unethical Behavior?. Etikonomi , 20 (1), 153 – 168. https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v20i1.15433.
研究欺骗对员工威胁评估过程、应对评估过程和组织中不道德行为的作用
本研究的目的是探讨欺骗是否影响员工的不道德行为、员工对威胁的感知以及他们的应对评估过程。研究了欺骗在影响员工威胁评价和应对评价加工中的作用。利用结构方程模型(PLS-SEM),本研究揭示了欺骗、不道德行为、员工感知威胁评价过程和应对评价过程之间存在较强的关系。实证研究结果表明,欺骗是组织中常见的做法,并显著影响不道德行为。本研究还发现,欺骗在降低员工对从事不道德行为的负面结果的威胁感知方面起着至关重要的作用,同时显著影响员工的感知应对评估过程,这表明欺骗行为可以保护员工免受发现其不道德行为的威胁。研究结果对欺骗行为、员工感知威胁评价过程、应对评价过程和不道德行为之间的关系提供了新的认识,并为该领域的进一步研究奠定了基础。JEL分类:L3, M1, M10, M14, M48引用方式:Jannat, T., Omar, n.a., & Alam, s.h.(2021)。欺骗是员工认知评价过程和不道德行为的前因吗?中华医学杂志,20(1),153 - 168。https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v20i1.15433。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Etikonomi
Etikonomi ECONOMICS-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信