Article: The Impact of Multilateral and Unilateral Measures on Profit-Shifting from South Africa to Mauritius

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW
Intertax Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.54648/taxi2023005
C. Botha, R. Ramfol, O. Swart
{"title":"Article: The Impact of Multilateral and Unilateral Measures on Profit-Shifting from South Africa to Mauritius","authors":"C. Botha, R. Ramfol, O. Swart","doi":"10.54648/taxi2023005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Mauritian global business sector’s favourable tax regime, combined with its extensive treaty network, has made it an attractive investment hub for investments into Africa. Aggressive tax planning strategies targeted at shifting profits to lower tax jurisdictions such as Mauritius, have eroded many higher tax jurisdictions’ tax bases. An exodus of (taxable) funds from South Africa to Mauritius is evident from South Africa’s listing as one of the top five contributors to Mauritius’s foreign direct investments (FDIs). While the base erosion and profit-shifting (BEPS) action plan is aimed at curbing profit-shifting practices, limited research is available on the successful implementation of the BEPS action plan. This article conducts a review of the implementation of the BEPS action plan by both jurisdictions, namely Mauritius (as a low tax jurisdiction) and South Africa (as a high tax jurisdiction). The success of the BEPS action plan in curbing profit-shifting practices from South Africa to Mauritius is measured in conjunction with the South African anti-avoidance legislation. The findings highlight that only Action 5 has been successfully adopted by both South Africa and Mauritius. A preliminary analysis was conducted which indicates that the implementation of the BEPS action plan will not result in less profit-shifting, due to gaps in the South African anti-avoidance legislation that facilitates these profit-shifting practices. It is suggested that the implementation of the BEPS action plan by higher tax jurisdictions should be prioritized. This article contributes to scholarship on evaluating the effectiveness of the BEPS action plan minimum standards for African countries.\nAction 5, aggressive tax planning strategies, base erosion and profit-shifting, base erosion and profit-shifting action plan, global business companies, foreign direct investments, Mauritius global business sector, minimum standards, offshore trust, profit-shifting, South African anti-avoidance legislation, tax avoidance, tax planning vehicles.","PeriodicalId":45365,"journal":{"name":"Intertax","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intertax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2023005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Mauritian global business sector’s favourable tax regime, combined with its extensive treaty network, has made it an attractive investment hub for investments into Africa. Aggressive tax planning strategies targeted at shifting profits to lower tax jurisdictions such as Mauritius, have eroded many higher tax jurisdictions’ tax bases. An exodus of (taxable) funds from South Africa to Mauritius is evident from South Africa’s listing as one of the top five contributors to Mauritius’s foreign direct investments (FDIs). While the base erosion and profit-shifting (BEPS) action plan is aimed at curbing profit-shifting practices, limited research is available on the successful implementation of the BEPS action plan. This article conducts a review of the implementation of the BEPS action plan by both jurisdictions, namely Mauritius (as a low tax jurisdiction) and South Africa (as a high tax jurisdiction). The success of the BEPS action plan in curbing profit-shifting practices from South Africa to Mauritius is measured in conjunction with the South African anti-avoidance legislation. The findings highlight that only Action 5 has been successfully adopted by both South Africa and Mauritius. A preliminary analysis was conducted which indicates that the implementation of the BEPS action plan will not result in less profit-shifting, due to gaps in the South African anti-avoidance legislation that facilitates these profit-shifting practices. It is suggested that the implementation of the BEPS action plan by higher tax jurisdictions should be prioritized. This article contributes to scholarship on evaluating the effectiveness of the BEPS action plan minimum standards for African countries. Action 5, aggressive tax planning strategies, base erosion and profit-shifting, base erosion and profit-shifting action plan, global business companies, foreign direct investments, Mauritius global business sector, minimum standards, offshore trust, profit-shifting, South African anti-avoidance legislation, tax avoidance, tax planning vehicles.
文章:多边和单边措施对利润从南非转移到毛里求斯的影响
毛里求斯全球商业部门的优惠税收制度,加上其广泛的条约网络,使其成为向非洲投资的有吸引力的投资中心。旨在将利润转移到毛里求斯等低税收司法管辖区的激进税收规划战略侵蚀了许多高税收司法管辖权的税基。从南非被列为毛里求斯外国直接投资的前五大贡献国之一可以明显看出,(应税)资金从南非流向毛里求斯。虽然基地侵蚀和利润转移(BEPS)行动计划旨在遏制利润转移做法,但对BEPS行动计划的成功实施研究有限。本文审查了毛里求斯(作为低税管辖区)和南非(作为高税管辖权)这两个管辖区对BEPS行动计划的实施情况。BEPS行动计划在遏制从南非向毛里求斯的利润转移行为方面的成功与南非的反避税立法相结合。调查结果强调,只有行动5得到南非和毛里求斯的成功通过。进行了初步分析,表明BEPS行动计划的实施不会减少利润转移,因为南非反避税立法中存在漏洞,有助于这些利润转移做法。建议优先考虑由较高税收管辖区实施BEPS行动计划。本文有助于评估BEPS行动计划最低标准对非洲国家的有效性。行动5,积极的税收规划战略,税基侵蚀和利润转移,税基流失和利润转移行动计划,全球商业公司,外国直接投资,毛里求斯全球商业部门,最低标准,离岸信托,利润转移,南非反避税立法,避税,税收规划工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intertax
Intertax LAW-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信