A matter of perspective: Distinct brain mechanisms for evaluating positive and negative social feedback about oneself and another person

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
E. Weik, N. Virji-Babul, U. Ribary, C. Tipper
{"title":"A matter of perspective: Distinct brain mechanisms for evaluating positive and negative social feedback about oneself and another person","authors":"E. Weik, N. Virji-Babul, U. Ribary, C. Tipper","doi":"10.1080/17470919.2022.2058081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Social rejection is a common experience in the life of young adults. Electroencephalographic (EEG) such as N1, P1 and P3 amplitude has been linked to experiencing social rejection; it remains unclear, whether these components are also influenced by the perspective, e.g., feedback directed to oneself or another person. We used EEG to investigate brain mechanisms associated with social feedback, directed either to oneself or another person. Female students (N = 57) engaged in a Chatroom Interact Task (CIT) during EEG. In this task participants received feedback as to whether themselves or someone else was accepted or rejected as a video chat partner. Mood was measured with the Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Participants showed more negative mood after rejection compared to acceptance. Spatiotemporal EEG cluster analysis revealed significant differences in P1, N1 and P3 ERP components associated with Acceptance vs. Rejection. The late positive potential (LPP) component was larger when processing self vs. other-related social feedback. Higher empathy, neuroticism, and lower age were associated with smaller LPP amplitude differences between Self and Other conditions. In this study we identified distinct brain dynamics associated with encoding social feedback and whether the feedback was targeted toward the self or to others.","PeriodicalId":49511,"journal":{"name":"Social Neuroscience","volume":"17 1","pages":"193 - 208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2022.2058081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Social rejection is a common experience in the life of young adults. Electroencephalographic (EEG) such as N1, P1 and P3 amplitude has been linked to experiencing social rejection; it remains unclear, whether these components are also influenced by the perspective, e.g., feedback directed to oneself or another person. We used EEG to investigate brain mechanisms associated with social feedback, directed either to oneself or another person. Female students (N = 57) engaged in a Chatroom Interact Task (CIT) during EEG. In this task participants received feedback as to whether themselves or someone else was accepted or rejected as a video chat partner. Mood was measured with the Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Participants showed more negative mood after rejection compared to acceptance. Spatiotemporal EEG cluster analysis revealed significant differences in P1, N1 and P3 ERP components associated with Acceptance vs. Rejection. The late positive potential (LPP) component was larger when processing self vs. other-related social feedback. Higher empathy, neuroticism, and lower age were associated with smaller LPP amplitude differences between Self and Other conditions. In this study we identified distinct brain dynamics associated with encoding social feedback and whether the feedback was targeted toward the self or to others.
观点的问题:不同的大脑机制来评估关于自己和他人的积极和消极的社会反馈
社会排斥是年轻人生活中常见的经历。脑电图(EEG)如N1、P1和P3振幅与经历社会排斥有关;目前尚不清楚,这些组成部分是否也受到观点的影响,例如,针对自己或他人的反馈。我们使用脑电图来研究与社会反馈相关的大脑机制,这些反馈既针对自己,也针对他人。女大学生(N = 57)在EEG期间参与聊天室互动任务(CIT)。在这个任务中,参与者收到了关于他们自己或其他人是否被接受或拒绝作为视频聊天伙伴的反馈。用积极影响-消极影响量表(PANAS)测量情绪。与接受相比,参与者在被拒绝后表现出更多的消极情绪。时空聚类分析显示,与接受和拒绝相关的P1、N1和P3 ERP成分存在显著差异。后期积极电位(LPP)成分在处理自我相关社会反馈时比处理他人相关社会反馈时更大。较高的共情、神经质和较低的年龄与自我和其他条件之间较小的LPP振幅差异相关。在这项研究中,我们发现了不同的大脑动态与编码社会反馈以及反馈是针对自己还是针对他人有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Neuroscience
Social Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Neuroscience features original empirical Research Papers as well as targeted Reviews, Commentaries and Fast Track Brief Reports that examine how the brain mediates social behavior, social cognition, social interactions and relationships, group social dynamics, and related topics that deal with social/interpersonal psychology and neurobiology. Multi-paper symposia and special topic issues are organized and presented regularly as well. The goal of Social Neuroscience is to provide a place to publish empirical articles that intend to further our understanding of the neural mechanisms contributing to the development and maintenance of social behaviors, or to understanding how these mechanisms are disrupted in clinical disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信