Product as a service (PaaS) for traditional product companies: an automotive lease practice evaluation

IF 2.1 Q3 BUSINESS
Pradeep Kesavapanikkar, R. Amit, Palaniappan Ramu
{"title":"Product as a service (PaaS) for traditional product companies: an automotive lease practice evaluation","authors":"Pradeep Kesavapanikkar, R. Amit, Palaniappan Ramu","doi":"10.1108/jibr-04-2022-0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nProduct as a service (PaaS) is a method of business innovation for traditional product companies to make their offerings more attractive, move up the value chain and find more customers. However, the customer acceptance of PaaS depends on the market in which it operates. The purpose of this study is to understand, through an automotive lease PaaS evaluation and from an outside-in user perspective, the effects of the main intrinsic and extrinsic factors of a product, its design and brand, on the lease versus buy decision of automobiles by consumers in an emerging market, to help companies transition to a PaaS business model.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA survey of actual car owners and lease car users was conducted. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the measurement model, followed by logistic regression for statistical modeling. As a practice evaluation of an existing PaaS example, this study further explored the expectations and experience of automotive lease users to link practical insights to analytical results and help businesses make a successful transition to PaaS.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results of the study showed the effect of the brand as significant in lease versus buy decisions. Brand loyalty is more important when leasing than when buying a car. However, brand awareness/association is less important for leasing than buying. There was no significant difference in consumer expectations of product design in automotive lease PaaS. Customers who buy and lease cars have the same expectations of the overall product in terms of its key design attributes.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe literature on PaaS has mostly focused on strategies, frameworks and guidelines for implementation and empirical studies are limited. Comparative analyses between PaaS and traditional ownership models are also limited. It is unclear how consumers’ expectations differ between PaaS and traditional ownership models, especially in emerging markets, because PaaS’s success depends on the market in which it operates. This study addresses this gap in the literature.\n","PeriodicalId":45364,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Business Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jibr-04-2022-0107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose Product as a service (PaaS) is a method of business innovation for traditional product companies to make their offerings more attractive, move up the value chain and find more customers. However, the customer acceptance of PaaS depends on the market in which it operates. The purpose of this study is to understand, through an automotive lease PaaS evaluation and from an outside-in user perspective, the effects of the main intrinsic and extrinsic factors of a product, its design and brand, on the lease versus buy decision of automobiles by consumers in an emerging market, to help companies transition to a PaaS business model. Design/methodology/approach A survey of actual car owners and lease car users was conducted. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the measurement model, followed by logistic regression for statistical modeling. As a practice evaluation of an existing PaaS example, this study further explored the expectations and experience of automotive lease users to link practical insights to analytical results and help businesses make a successful transition to PaaS. Findings The results of the study showed the effect of the brand as significant in lease versus buy decisions. Brand loyalty is more important when leasing than when buying a car. However, brand awareness/association is less important for leasing than buying. There was no significant difference in consumer expectations of product design in automotive lease PaaS. Customers who buy and lease cars have the same expectations of the overall product in terms of its key design attributes. Originality/value The literature on PaaS has mostly focused on strategies, frameworks and guidelines for implementation and empirical studies are limited. Comparative analyses between PaaS and traditional ownership models are also limited. It is unclear how consumers’ expectations differ between PaaS and traditional ownership models, especially in emerging markets, because PaaS’s success depends on the market in which it operates. This study addresses this gap in the literature.
传统产品公司的产品即服务(PaaS):汽车租赁实践评估
目的产品即服务(PaaS)是传统产品公司的一种商业创新方法,旨在使其产品更具吸引力,在价值链上向上移动,并找到更多客户。然而,客户对PaaS的接受程度取决于其运营的市场。本研究的目的是通过汽车租赁PaaS评估,从用户内外的角度,了解产品的主要内在和外在因素、设计和品牌对新兴市场消费者汽车租赁与购买决策的影响,以帮助公司过渡到PaaS商业模式。设计/方法/方法对实际车主和租赁汽车用户进行了调查。验证性因素分析用于检验测量模型,然后进行逻辑回归进行统计建模。作为对现有PaaS示例的实践评估,本研究进一步探讨了汽车租赁用户的期望和体验,以将实际见解与分析结果联系起来,并帮助企业成功过渡到PaaS.Findings。研究结果表明,品牌在租赁与购买决策中的作用同样重要。品牌忠诚度在租赁时比买车时更重要。然而,对于租赁来说,品牌知名度/关联度不如购买重要。在汽车租赁PaaS中,消费者对产品设计的期望没有显著差异。购买和租赁汽车的客户对整个产品的关键设计属性有着相同的期望。独创性/价值关于PaaS的文献主要集中在实施的战略、框架和指南上,实证研究有限。PaaS和传统所有权模型之间的比较分析也很有限。目前尚不清楚消费者对PaaS和传统所有权模式的期望有何不同,尤其是在新兴市场,因为PaaS的成功取决于其运营的市场。这项研究解决了文献中的这一空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信