Cost-effectiveness of Hepatitis A vaccination in a developed and developing country.

IF 1 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Nidhi Ghildayal
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of Hepatitis A vaccination in a developed and developing country.","authors":"Nidhi Ghildayal","doi":"10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2019-0096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nHepatitis A is a prevalent disease that is largely preventable by vaccine usage. The vaccine for this illness is highly underused in most regions. In an attempt to find the strategies that are most beneficial in regard to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost in current environments, the purpose of this paper is to conduct cost-effectiveness analyses to investigate vaccination strategies in a more economically developed country (MEDC), generally known as a \"developed\" area: the USA, and a less economically developed country (LEDC), generally known as a \"developing\" area: the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.\n\n\nDESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH\nThis study used a dynamic transmission model for comparative effectiveness analyses. The model ran two different scenarios. The two regions studied have different policies and strategies for Hepatitis A vaccination currently, and also used different strategies in 2009. In the USA, a universal vaccination policy was modeled, along with a scenario in which it was removed. In Rio de Janeiro, a no vaccination policy was modeled, along with a scenario in which a universal vaccination policy was effected.\n\n\nFINDINGS\nThe comparison of resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio values to accepted threshold values showed universal vaccination to be cost-effective in both the USA and Rio de Janeiro as compared to no vaccination. When episode and vaccination costs and vaccination efficacy were varied, this still remained true. Universal vaccination was found to result in lower incidence of Hepatitis A in both the USA and Rio de Janeiro. Over the twenty-year time horizon, universal vaccination is projected to prevent 506,945 cases of symptomatic Hepatitis A in the USA and 42,318 cases of Hepatitis A in Rio de Janeiro. Other benefits include a projected increase in cumulative QALYs through the use of universal vaccination.\n\n\nORIGINALITY/VALUE\nThis analysis showed universal vaccination to be cost-effective as compared to no vaccination, and portions of the study's approach had not previously been applied in tandem to investigate Hepatitis A interventions. The results may help foster higher compliance rates for Hepatitis A vaccination and even greater per-person economic benefits of universal vaccination, particularly in the USA. The purpose of this study is also to encourage elevated levels of surveillance on age of infection in developing regions and consistent reevaluation utilizing dynamic transmission models in both the USA and Brazil, as well as other rapidly developing regions, in order to prevent future epidemics and costs associated with the disease.","PeriodicalId":47455,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2019-0096","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2019-0096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

PURPOSE Hepatitis A is a prevalent disease that is largely preventable by vaccine usage. The vaccine for this illness is highly underused in most regions. In an attempt to find the strategies that are most beneficial in regard to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost in current environments, the purpose of this paper is to conduct cost-effectiveness analyses to investigate vaccination strategies in a more economically developed country (MEDC), generally known as a "developed" area: the USA, and a less economically developed country (LEDC), generally known as a "developing" area: the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH This study used a dynamic transmission model for comparative effectiveness analyses. The model ran two different scenarios. The two regions studied have different policies and strategies for Hepatitis A vaccination currently, and also used different strategies in 2009. In the USA, a universal vaccination policy was modeled, along with a scenario in which it was removed. In Rio de Janeiro, a no vaccination policy was modeled, along with a scenario in which a universal vaccination policy was effected. FINDINGS The comparison of resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio values to accepted threshold values showed universal vaccination to be cost-effective in both the USA and Rio de Janeiro as compared to no vaccination. When episode and vaccination costs and vaccination efficacy were varied, this still remained true. Universal vaccination was found to result in lower incidence of Hepatitis A in both the USA and Rio de Janeiro. Over the twenty-year time horizon, universal vaccination is projected to prevent 506,945 cases of symptomatic Hepatitis A in the USA and 42,318 cases of Hepatitis A in Rio de Janeiro. Other benefits include a projected increase in cumulative QALYs through the use of universal vaccination. ORIGINALITY/VALUE This analysis showed universal vaccination to be cost-effective as compared to no vaccination, and portions of the study's approach had not previously been applied in tandem to investigate Hepatitis A interventions. The results may help foster higher compliance rates for Hepatitis A vaccination and even greater per-person economic benefits of universal vaccination, particularly in the USA. The purpose of this study is also to encourage elevated levels of surveillance on age of infection in developing regions and consistent reevaluation utilizing dynamic transmission models in both the USA and Brazil, as well as other rapidly developing regions, in order to prevent future epidemics and costs associated with the disease.
发达国家和发展中国家甲型肝炎疫苗接种的成本效益。
目的性肝炎A是一种流行性疾病,使用疫苗在很大程度上可以预防。这种疾病的疫苗在大多数地区都没有得到充分利用。为了找到在当前环境中对质量调整寿命(QALYs)和成本最有利的策略,本文的目的是进行成本效益分析,以调查经济较发达国家(MEDC)(通常被称为“发达”地区)的疫苗接种策略:美国和经济欠发达国家(LEDC),通常被称为“发展中”地区:巴西里约热内卢州。设计/方法/方法本研究使用了一个动态传输模型进行比较有效性分析。该模型运行了两种不同的场景。研究的两个地区目前有不同的甲型肝炎疫苗接种政策和策略,2009年也使用了不同的策略。在美国,制定了一项普遍的疫苗接种政策,并将其删除。在里约热内卢,建立了一个不接种疫苗的政策模型,以及一个实施普遍疫苗接种政策的情景。结果将由此产生的增量成本效益比值与可接受的阈值进行比较表明,与不接种疫苗相比,在美国和里约热内卢,普遍接种疫苗具有成本效益。当发病率、疫苗接种成本和疫苗接种效果各不相同时,这仍然是事实。在美国和里约热内卢,普遍接种疫苗可以降低甲型肝炎的发病率。在20年的时间范围内,普遍接种疫苗预计将在美国预防506945例有症状的甲型肝炎,在里约热内卢预防42318例甲型肝炎。其他好处包括通过普及疫苗接种,预计累计QALYs会增加。起源/价值这项分析表明,与不接种疫苗相比,普遍接种疫苗具有成本效益,而且该研究的部分方法以前没有同时应用于研究甲型肝炎干预措施。这一结果可能有助于提高甲型肝炎疫苗接种的依从性,并提高全民疫苗接种的人均经济效益,特别是在美国。本研究的目的还在于鼓励提高发展中地区对感染年龄的监测水平,并利用美国和巴西的动态传播模型进行一致的重新评估,以及其他快速发展的地区,以防止未来的流行病和与该疾病相关的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: ■Successful quality/continuous improvement projects ■The use of quality tools and models in leadership management development such as the EFQM Excellence Model, Balanced Scorecard, Quality Standards, Managed Care ■Issues relating to process control such as Six Sigma, Leadership, Managing Change and Process Mapping ■Improving patient care through quality related programmes and/or research Articles that use quantitative and qualitative methods are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信