Characteristics analysis of interior and inset type permanent magnet motors for electric vehicle applications

P. Irasari, Ketut Wirtayasa, P. Widiyanto, M. Hikmawan, M. Kasim
{"title":"Characteristics analysis of interior and inset type permanent magnet motors for electric vehicle applications","authors":"P. Irasari, Ketut Wirtayasa, P. Widiyanto, M. Hikmawan, M. Kasim","doi":"10.14203/j.mev.2021.v12.1-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Permanent magnet motors (PMMs) are widely used in electric vehicles because of their benefits. Based on the permanent magnet topologies on the rotor, PMMs are classified into three types: surface mounted PMM, inset PMM, and interior PMM. This paper discusses a comparison of the characteristics of interior and inset types of PMMs for electric vehicle applications. The study aims to find out the effect of the rotor construction on the magnetic characteristics, torque-speed characteristics, and cogging torque. Simulations were carried out analytically and numerically using the FEMM 4.2 software. The simulation results at the base speed show that the interior PMM generates a higher torque but with a lower rotation, namely 56.47 Nm and 3162 rpm, respectively, while the inset PMM produces higher rotation 4200 rpm but lower output torque of 46.01 Nm. However, with a higher saliency ratio, the interior PMM produces higher maximum torque and speed at both constant torque and field weakening regions than the PMM inset, which is 92.87 Nm and 6310 rpm, consecutively. In terms of cogging torque, the interior PMM raises it slightly higher (2.90 Nm) than the inset PMM (1.93 Nm). The results conclude that, in general, the interior PMM shows better performance in all studied regions and is preferable for electric vehicle applications.","PeriodicalId":30530,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mechatronics Electrical Power and Vehicular Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mechatronics Electrical Power and Vehicular Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14203/j.mev.2021.v12.1-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Permanent magnet motors (PMMs) are widely used in electric vehicles because of their benefits. Based on the permanent magnet topologies on the rotor, PMMs are classified into three types: surface mounted PMM, inset PMM, and interior PMM. This paper discusses a comparison of the characteristics of interior and inset types of PMMs for electric vehicle applications. The study aims to find out the effect of the rotor construction on the magnetic characteristics, torque-speed characteristics, and cogging torque. Simulations were carried out analytically and numerically using the FEMM 4.2 software. The simulation results at the base speed show that the interior PMM generates a higher torque but with a lower rotation, namely 56.47 Nm and 3162 rpm, respectively, while the inset PMM produces higher rotation 4200 rpm but lower output torque of 46.01 Nm. However, with a higher saliency ratio, the interior PMM produces higher maximum torque and speed at both constant torque and field weakening regions than the PMM inset, which is 92.87 Nm and 6310 rpm, consecutively. In terms of cogging torque, the interior PMM raises it slightly higher (2.90 Nm) than the inset PMM (1.93 Nm). The results conclude that, in general, the interior PMM shows better performance in all studied regions and is preferable for electric vehicle applications.
电动汽车用内置式和嵌入式永磁电机的特性分析
永磁电机因其优点被广泛应用于电动汽车中。根据转子上的永磁体拓扑结构,PMM可分为三种类型:表面安装PMM、嵌入式PMM和内部PMM。本文讨论了用于电动汽车应用的内部和嵌入式PMM的特性的比较。该研究旨在找出转子结构对磁特性、转矩-速度特性和齿槽转矩的影响。使用FEMM4.2软件进行了分析和数值模拟。基本速度下的模拟结果表明,内部PMM产生更高的扭矩,但转速较低,分别为56.47 Nm和3162 rpm,而嵌入式PMM产生较高的转速4200 rpm,但输出扭矩较低,为46.01 Nm。然而,在具有更高的凸极比的情况下,内部PMM在恒定扭矩和场削弱区域产生的最大扭矩和速度都高于PMM插入,连续为92.87Nm和6310rpm。就齿槽扭矩而言,内部PMM将其提高得略高于嵌入式PMM(1.93 Nm)(2.90 Nm)。结果表明,总体而言,内部PMM在所有研究区域都表现出更好的性能,更适合电动汽车应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信