Tradução e validação do Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire para o português do Brasil

Q Medicine

Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia Pub Date : 2017-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rbr.2016.09.002

Danilo Harudy Kamonseki, Luísa Cedin, Jaqueline Tavares‐Preto, Beatriz de Oliveira Peixoto, Sandro Rostelato‐Ferreira

{"title":"Tradução e validação do Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire para o português do Brasil","authors":"Danilo Harudy Kamonseki, Luísa Cedin, Jaqueline Tavares‐Preto, Beatriz de Oliveira Peixoto, Sandro Rostelato‐Ferreira","doi":"10.1016/j.rbr.2016.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To translate the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese, cross‐culturally adapt, and to verify its validity and its reliability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The development of the Brazilian version of Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (Brazil‐NBQ) was based on the guideline proposed by Guillemin. The applied process consisted of translation, back‐translation, committee review and pre‐test. Sixty‐one volunteers presenting neck pain participated in this study. Thirty‐five of them participated during pre‐testing phase to verify the instrument comprehension, and the remaining 26 took part during psychometric analysis. Psychometric evaluation included interrater and intrarater reliability and construct validity (correlation among Brazil‐NBQ, SF‐36, Numerical rating score and Neck Disability Index).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Some terms and expressions were changed to obtain cultural equivalence for Brazil‐NBQ during the translation phase. The NBQ showed an intrarater ICC of 0.96 and interrater ICC of 0.87. Construct validity analysis showed moderate correlations with SF‐36 and strong correlation with Numerical rating score and Neck Disability Index.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire was translated and culturally adapted to Portuguese language, and it demonstrated to be valid and reliable to evaluate patientś neck pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48991,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbr.2016.09.002","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0482500416300912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective

To translate the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese, cross‐culturally adapt, and to verify its validity and its reliability.

Methods

The development of the Brazilian version of Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (Brazil‐NBQ) was based on the guideline proposed by Guillemin. The applied process consisted of translation, back‐translation, committee review and pre‐test. Sixty‐one volunteers presenting neck pain participated in this study. Thirty‐five of them participated during pre‐testing phase to verify the instrument comprehension, and the remaining 26 took part during psychometric analysis. Psychometric evaluation included interrater and intrarater reliability and construct validity (correlation among Brazil‐NBQ, SF‐36, Numerical rating score and Neck Disability Index).

Results

Some terms and expressions were changed to obtain cultural equivalence for Brazil‐NBQ during the translation phase. The NBQ showed an intrarater ICC of 0.96 and interrater ICC of 0.87. Construct validity analysis showed moderate correlations with SF‐36 and strong correlation with Numerical rating score and Neck Disability Index.

Conclusion

Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire was translated and culturally adapted to Portuguese language, and it demonstrated to be valid and reliable to evaluate patientś neck pain.

查看原文本刊更多论文

tradup

目的将颈部伯恩茅斯问卷翻译成巴西葡萄牙语，进行跨文化适应，并验证其效度和信度。方法根据Guillemin提出的指南编制巴西版伯恩茅斯颈部问卷(Brazilian‐NBQ)。申请过程包括翻译、回译、委员会审查和预测试。61名出现颈部疼痛的志愿者参加了这项研究。其中35人参加了预测试阶段的工具理解验证，其余26人参加了心理测量分析。心理测量评估包括解释者和解释者内信度和结构效度(巴西‐NBQ、SF‐36、数值评定得分和颈部残疾指数之间的相关性)。结果在翻译阶段，为了使巴西语与NBQ语的文化对等，对部分术语和表达进行了修改。NBQ的内部ICC为0.96，内部ICC为0.87。结构效度分析显示SF‐36与结构效度呈正相关，与数值评分和颈部残疾指数呈正相关。结论颈部伯恩茅斯问卷经葡萄牙语翻译并进行文化适应，可有效、可靠地评价患者颈部疼痛。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia RHEUMATOLOGY-

CiteScore

0.82

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： RBR nasceu da necessidade de se criar um órgão oficial da SBR que pudesse divulgar a produção científica dos reumatologistas brasileiros. O primeiro número foi publicado em setembro de 1957. A partir do volume 18 (1978), passou a seis números, com periodicidade atual. A RBR, em sua trajetória, tem sido objeto de constantes mudanças, sempre visando ao seu aprimoramento e revitalização, tanto em sua apresentação como em seu conteúdo.