Radiotherapy dose escalation in the primary treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

L. B. A. Co, R. A. Agas, J. Jacinto, K. Yu, M. A. Mejia, W. Bacorro
{"title":"Radiotherapy dose escalation in the primary treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"L. B. A. Co, R. A. Agas, J. Jacinto, K. Yu, M. A. Mejia, W. Bacorro","doi":"10.21037/ANPC.2019.04.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Dose escalation with radiotherapy (RT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains underutilized despite significant advances in methods of radiation delivery. RT boost during primary treatment has been shown to improve local control rates, which could have an impact on survival. We summarize the currently available evidence for dose escalation in the primary treatment of NPC. \n Methods: Databases were systematically searched for eligible studies from the year 2000. Included studies utilized RT dose escalation (BED >70 Gy) in the form of brachytherapy, external beam RT or stereotactic RT boost after external beam RT for primary treatment of NPC. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), overall survival (OS), toxicities and other relevant factors for the chosen studies were then pooled and analyzed. \n Results: Two randomized trials and 7 retrospective cohort studies with a total of 2,145 patients were included in the final analysis. Nine hundred and eighty-eight patients received dose escalation, mainly in the form of brachytherapy (90%). Patients were mostly male, from China/Southeast Asia, had T1-T2 disease (80%), underwent RT via conventional techniques (87%). Less than half received concurrent chemotherapy. Three-year LRFS (RR 1.04; 95% CI: 0.85–1.28, P=0.71) and OS were not significantly improved with dose escalation. However, the subset of patients pooled from the retrospective studies who did not receive concurrent chemotherapy showed significant a 5-year locoregional failure-free survival (RR 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02–1.09, P=0.005) benefit. Toxicities were not significantly increased with dose escalation. \n Conclusions: RT dose escalation in the primary treatment of NPC does not lead to an increase in LRFS, OS, progression free-survival and disease free-survival. However, there seems to be a LRFS benefit with dose escalation using brachytherapy in patients with T1-T2 disease and in patients who did not receive concurrent chemotherapy. Dose escalation with brachytherapy is likewise not significantly associated with any increase in the rate of complications. Data for the efficacy and toxicity of EBRT and SRT boost is currently still lacking.","PeriodicalId":93728,"journal":{"name":"Annals of nasopharynx cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/ANPC.2019.04.01","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of nasopharynx cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/ANPC.2019.04.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Dose escalation with radiotherapy (RT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains underutilized despite significant advances in methods of radiation delivery. RT boost during primary treatment has been shown to improve local control rates, which could have an impact on survival. We summarize the currently available evidence for dose escalation in the primary treatment of NPC. Methods: Databases were systematically searched for eligible studies from the year 2000. Included studies utilized RT dose escalation (BED >70 Gy) in the form of brachytherapy, external beam RT or stereotactic RT boost after external beam RT for primary treatment of NPC. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), overall survival (OS), toxicities and other relevant factors for the chosen studies were then pooled and analyzed. Results: Two randomized trials and 7 retrospective cohort studies with a total of 2,145 patients were included in the final analysis. Nine hundred and eighty-eight patients received dose escalation, mainly in the form of brachytherapy (90%). Patients were mostly male, from China/Southeast Asia, had T1-T2 disease (80%), underwent RT via conventional techniques (87%). Less than half received concurrent chemotherapy. Three-year LRFS (RR 1.04; 95% CI: 0.85–1.28, P=0.71) and OS were not significantly improved with dose escalation. However, the subset of patients pooled from the retrospective studies who did not receive concurrent chemotherapy showed significant a 5-year locoregional failure-free survival (RR 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02–1.09, P=0.005) benefit. Toxicities were not significantly increased with dose escalation. Conclusions: RT dose escalation in the primary treatment of NPC does not lead to an increase in LRFS, OS, progression free-survival and disease free-survival. However, there seems to be a LRFS benefit with dose escalation using brachytherapy in patients with T1-T2 disease and in patients who did not receive concurrent chemotherapy. Dose escalation with brachytherapy is likewise not significantly associated with any increase in the rate of complications. Data for the efficacy and toxicity of EBRT and SRT boost is currently still lacking.
放疗剂量递增在鼻咽癌初级治疗中的应用:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:尽管放射治疗方法取得了重大进展,但鼻咽癌放疗(RT)的剂量递增仍未得到充分利用。初步治疗期间加强RT已被证明可以提高局部控制率,这可能会对生存率产生影响。我们总结了目前可获得的NPC初级治疗剂量增加的证据。方法:系统检索2000年以来符合条件的研究数据库。纳入的研究采用近距离放疗、外束放疗或外束放疗后立体定向放疗增强的形式进行放疗剂量递增(BED>70 Gy),用于NPC的初级治疗。然后对所选研究的局部无复发生存率(LRFS)、总生存率(OS)、毒性和其他相关因素进行汇总和分析。结果:两项随机试验和7项回顾性队列研究共2145名患者被纳入最终分析。988名患者接受了剂量递增治疗,主要是近距离放射治疗(90%)。患者大多为男性,来自中国/东南亚,患有T1-T2疾病(80%),通过常规技术接受RT(87%)。不到一半的患者同时接受了化疗。三年LRFS(RR 1.04;95%CI:0.85-1.28,P=0.71)和OS没有随着剂量的增加而显著改善。然而,从回顾性研究中汇集的未同时接受化疗的患者子集显示出显著的5年局部无失败生存率(RR 1.05;95%CI:1.02–1.09,P=0.005)益处。毒性并没有随着剂量的增加而显著增加。结论:鼻咽癌初级治疗中放疗剂量的增加不会导致LRFS、OS、无进展生存率和无疾病生存率的增加。然而,在T1-T2疾病患者和未同时接受化疗的患者中,使用近距离放射治疗的剂量增加似乎对LRFS有益。近距离放射治疗的剂量增加同样与并发症发生率的任何增加都没有显著关联。目前还缺乏关于EBRT和SRT增强的疗效和毒性的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信