Rectal sclerotherapy in children: An author's experience with a sclerosant

J. Aihole
{"title":"Rectal sclerotherapy in children: An author's experience with a sclerosant","authors":"J. Aihole","doi":"10.4103/wjcs.wjcs_26_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Rectal prolapse in children is mainly managed by conservative treatment, especially in those aged <3 years; however, intervention is indicated in cases with persistent and recurrent prolapse that is resistant to conservative treatment. Objective: To determine the efficacy of sclerotherapy using sodium tetradecyl sulphate as a sclerosant in treating rectal prolapse in children. Design: A retrospective chart review. Settings: The study was conducted in a tertiary care pediatric center in Bengaluru, Karnataka. Patients (Material) and Methods: Children aged ≥1 year with persistent rectal prolapse were included in this study, which was conducted from January 2013 to December 2021. The median follow-up period was 1 year. Main Outcome Measure: Resolution of the rectal prolapse. Sample Size: Three hundred and eighty-seven patients. Results: The success rate was 93.5% (43/46) after sclerotherapy treatment. Recurrence was noted in 6.5% of the patients who required a second dose of sclerotherapy or surgery. The median follow-up period was 8 months. There were no remarkable complications or mortality. Conclusion: Rectal sclerotherapy injection is a safe, low-cost procedure with low recurrence rate in children. Limitations: Ours was a retrospective, single-center study, and no control group was utilized. Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.","PeriodicalId":90396,"journal":{"name":"World journal of colorectal surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of colorectal surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/wjcs.wjcs_26_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rectal prolapse in children is mainly managed by conservative treatment, especially in those aged <3 years; however, intervention is indicated in cases with persistent and recurrent prolapse that is resistant to conservative treatment. Objective: To determine the efficacy of sclerotherapy using sodium tetradecyl sulphate as a sclerosant in treating rectal prolapse in children. Design: A retrospective chart review. Settings: The study was conducted in a tertiary care pediatric center in Bengaluru, Karnataka. Patients (Material) and Methods: Children aged ≥1 year with persistent rectal prolapse were included in this study, which was conducted from January 2013 to December 2021. The median follow-up period was 1 year. Main Outcome Measure: Resolution of the rectal prolapse. Sample Size: Three hundred and eighty-seven patients. Results: The success rate was 93.5% (43/46) after sclerotherapy treatment. Recurrence was noted in 6.5% of the patients who required a second dose of sclerotherapy or surgery. The median follow-up period was 8 months. There were no remarkable complications or mortality. Conclusion: Rectal sclerotherapy injection is a safe, low-cost procedure with low recurrence rate in children. Limitations: Ours was a retrospective, single-center study, and no control group was utilized. Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
儿童直肠硬化治疗:作者使用硬化剂的经验
背景:儿童直肠脱垂主要采用保守治疗,尤其是3岁以下儿童;然而,对保守治疗有抵抗力的持续性和复发性脱垂的病例需要进行干预。目的:观察十四烷基硫酸钠硬化剂治疗小儿直肠脱垂的疗效。设计:回顾性图表回顾。背景:这项研究是在卡纳塔克邦班加罗尔的一家三级护理儿科中心进行的。患者(材料)和方法:本研究纳入年龄≥1岁的持续性直肠脱垂儿童,研究时间为2013年1月至2021年12月。中位随访期为1年。主要疗效指标:直肠脱垂的消退。样本量:387名患者。结果:硬化治疗成功率为93.5%(43/46)。在需要第二剂硬化治疗或手术的患者中,6.5%的患者出现复发。中位随访期为8个月。无明显并发症或死亡。结论:直肠硬化注射是一种安全、低成本、低复发率的儿童手术。局限性:我们的研究是一项回顾性的单中心研究,没有使用对照组。利益冲突:作者无需声明利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信