Perceptual errors in Iranian society: A qualitative study

E. Samadipour, H. Seyedin, H. Ravaghi
{"title":"Perceptual errors in Iranian society: A qualitative study","authors":"E. Samadipour, H. Seyedin, H. Ravaghi","doi":"10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Background: General risk perception is defined as the collective wisdom of comprehension of risk, exposure and hazard in a society which decisions made during accidents and disasters are driven by the risk perceived by the influenced society. Always, the path of reaches to general perception is not smooth, one of the reasons of low impact risk reduction programs are perceptual errors that threat personal safety. Methods: This qualitative study was done considering the grounded theory. Thirty individuals participated in this study who were divided into two groups of expertise and ordinary people with maximum diversity. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Results: The finding of the study were extracted from 1357 primary codes. The risk perception structure in Iranian society was threatened with five diminishing factors called perceptual errors, negative experiences, negative beliefs, disapprovals and institutional factors. A perceptual error was due to an error in the estimation power of risk and error in its ability. The errors are less or excessive than the realistic estimated of the actual hazard. The individual's ability referred to coping power, therefore mistakenly estimates can cause personal injury. Some people consider denial or low-risk approach to their power to be sufficiently coped or dispersed. Negative experience occurs due to normalization of risk, and failure to predict incidence. Risk perception is deliberately and voluntarily done. Non-acceptance is due to disclaimer of self-disclosure, conflict of interest. Institutional agents mean institutions that consist of governmental and non-governmental organizations that manage risk reduction. Some of institution agent are lack of commitment, trust, practical obligation and Instrumental use of people. Conclusions: The finding of this study can be identify perception errors that may play important role in actual understanding and create reasonable concern to providing precaution and safety. Actual risk perception formation need to educational, cultural and institutional strategies to promote risk perception. In order to paving up the safety upgrade path, policy makers, cultural, political and social managers can monitor and control this perception errors. Keywords: Risk perception, Risk reduction, Safety upgrade, Perception error, Iranian society","PeriodicalId":32422,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Injury and Violence Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Injury and Violence Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Background: General risk perception is defined as the collective wisdom of comprehension of risk, exposure and hazard in a society which decisions made during accidents and disasters are driven by the risk perceived by the influenced society. Always, the path of reaches to general perception is not smooth, one of the reasons of low impact risk reduction programs are perceptual errors that threat personal safety. Methods: This qualitative study was done considering the grounded theory. Thirty individuals participated in this study who were divided into two groups of expertise and ordinary people with maximum diversity. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Results: The finding of the study were extracted from 1357 primary codes. The risk perception structure in Iranian society was threatened with five diminishing factors called perceptual errors, negative experiences, negative beliefs, disapprovals and institutional factors. A perceptual error was due to an error in the estimation power of risk and error in its ability. The errors are less or excessive than the realistic estimated of the actual hazard. The individual's ability referred to coping power, therefore mistakenly estimates can cause personal injury. Some people consider denial or low-risk approach to their power to be sufficiently coped or dispersed. Negative experience occurs due to normalization of risk, and failure to predict incidence. Risk perception is deliberately and voluntarily done. Non-acceptance is due to disclaimer of self-disclosure, conflict of interest. Institutional agents mean institutions that consist of governmental and non-governmental organizations that manage risk reduction. Some of institution agent are lack of commitment, trust, practical obligation and Instrumental use of people. Conclusions: The finding of this study can be identify perception errors that may play important role in actual understanding and create reasonable concern to providing precaution and safety. Actual risk perception formation need to educational, cultural and institutional strategies to promote risk perception. In order to paving up the safety upgrade path, policy makers, cultural, political and social managers can monitor and control this perception errors. Keywords: Risk perception, Risk reduction, Safety upgrade, Perception error, Iranian society
伊朗社会的知觉错误:一项质的研究
摘要:背景:一般风险感知被定义为理解社会中的风险、暴露和危害的集体智慧,在事故和灾难期间做出的决策是由受影响社会感知的风险驱动的。总的来说,获得普遍感知的道路并不平坦,低影响风险降低计划的原因之一是威胁人身安全的感知错误。方法:采用扎根理论进行定性研究。30人参与了这项研究,他们被分为两组,一组是专业人士,另一组是具有最大多样性的普通人。数据是通过半结构化访谈收集的。结果:从1357个初级编码中提取了本研究的发现。伊朗社会的风险感知结构受到五个递减因素的威胁,即感知错误、消极经历、消极信念、不赞成和制度因素。感知误差是由于风险估计能力的误差及其能力的误差。误差小于或超过实际危险的实际估计值。个人的能力指的是应对能力,因此错误地估计可能会造成人身伤害。一些人认为,否认或低风险的方法可以充分应对或分散他们的权力。负面体验的发生是由于风险的正常化,以及未能预测发病率。风险感知是有意和自愿的。不接受是由于免责声明的自我披露,利益冲突。机构代理人是指由管理减少风险的政府和非政府组织组成的机构。部分制度代理人缺乏对人的承诺、信任、实际义务和工具性使用。结论:本研究的发现可以识别可能在实际理解中发挥重要作用的感知错误,并为提供预防措施和安全性创造合理的关注。实际风险感知的形成需要教育、文化和制度策略来促进风险感知。为了铺平安全升级道路,政策制定者、文化、政治和社会管理者可以监测和控制这种感知错误。关键词:风险感知、风险降低、安全升级、感知错误、伊朗社会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Injury and Violence Research (JIVR) is a peer-reviewed open-access medical journal covering all aspects of traumatology includes quantitative and qualitative studies in the field of clinical and basic sciences about trauma, burns, drowning, falls, occupational/road/ sport safety, youth violence, child/elder abuse, child/elder injuries, intimate partner abuse/sexual violence, self-harm, suicide, patient safety, safe communities, consumer safety, disaster management, terrorism, surveillance/burden of injury and all other intentional and unintentional injuries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信