Venous Chimney Procedure: A Novel Technical Solution to Prevent Iatrogenic Budd– Chiari Syndrome Following Retrohepatic Vena Cava Injury

IF 0.4 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
E. Heldenberg, D. Hebron, B. Kessel, O. Galili, I. Zoarets, Y. Klein, Aiya Assif
{"title":"Venous Chimney Procedure: A Novel Technical Solution to Prevent Iatrogenic Budd– Chiari Syndrome Following Retrohepatic Vena Cava Injury","authors":"E. Heldenberg, D. Hebron, B. Kessel, O. Galili, I. Zoarets, Y. Klein, Aiya Assif","doi":"10.26676/jevtm.v40i(2).132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traumatic inferior vena cava (IVC) lesions account for approximately 25% of abdominal vascular injuries and are among the most challenging and lethal lesions sustained by trauma patients. Whether caused by blunt or penetrating mechanisms of injury, the overall mortality rate is up to 92%; as many as 50% of  the patients with those injuries die before reaching medical care, and the mortality rate among patients who arrive to a trauma center, with signs of life and/or receive operative treatment, ranges between 20% and 57% (1). \nRetrohepatic Vena Cava (RHVC) injuries (RHVCI) are extremely rare and as such both the treating trauma surgeon, as well as the vascular surgeon, lacks the necessary experience to deal with such complicated injuries. The mortality rates secondary to these injuries are extremely high, even with damage control management concepts application. Improving the outcome of these injuries remains a significant challenge of modern trauma care (2, 3). \nThe treatment of RHVCI confronts the treating surgeon, with major obstacles, which raises from the anatomic location of the RHVC at the posterior aspect of the liver and the abundancy of bridging veins between the RHVC and the liver. These anatomic obstacles creates a major technical challenge of gaining proximal and distal control, in proximity to the injured RHVC. This many times necessitates abdominal as well as thoracic exposure in order to gain proper control. \nThe average trauma, as well as the vascular, surgeons are not familiar with handling such complex injuries. This is even truer as referred to the new generation of vascular surgeons, whose experience with open vascular surgery, mainly in such extreme situations, decreases with the increasing usage of endovascular techniques (4).    \n The advancements in endovascular techniques have introduced new alternatives to traditional open repair strategies. In many cases, RHVCI treatment requires exploration of a retro-hepatic hematoma, which might be the single thing that prevents free venous rupture and as such, it should be avoided.  Venous balloon occlusion is a novel endovascular strategy that may be particularly advantageous in those circumstances as a bridging maneuver, for proximal and distal control, during hybrid repair. Our case in unique since it highlights the option of total endovascular treatment, using arterial treatment concepts, to treat this extremely challenging injury.   \n ","PeriodicalId":41233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26676/jevtm.v40i(2).132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Traumatic inferior vena cava (IVC) lesions account for approximately 25% of abdominal vascular injuries and are among the most challenging and lethal lesions sustained by trauma patients. Whether caused by blunt or penetrating mechanisms of injury, the overall mortality rate is up to 92%; as many as 50% of  the patients with those injuries die before reaching medical care, and the mortality rate among patients who arrive to a trauma center, with signs of life and/or receive operative treatment, ranges between 20% and 57% (1). Retrohepatic Vena Cava (RHVC) injuries (RHVCI) are extremely rare and as such both the treating trauma surgeon, as well as the vascular surgeon, lacks the necessary experience to deal with such complicated injuries. The mortality rates secondary to these injuries are extremely high, even with damage control management concepts application. Improving the outcome of these injuries remains a significant challenge of modern trauma care (2, 3). The treatment of RHVCI confronts the treating surgeon, with major obstacles, which raises from the anatomic location of the RHVC at the posterior aspect of the liver and the abundancy of bridging veins between the RHVC and the liver. These anatomic obstacles creates a major technical challenge of gaining proximal and distal control, in proximity to the injured RHVC. This many times necessitates abdominal as well as thoracic exposure in order to gain proper control. The average trauma, as well as the vascular, surgeons are not familiar with handling such complex injuries. This is even truer as referred to the new generation of vascular surgeons, whose experience with open vascular surgery, mainly in such extreme situations, decreases with the increasing usage of endovascular techniques (4).     The advancements in endovascular techniques have introduced new alternatives to traditional open repair strategies. In many cases, RHVCI treatment requires exploration of a retro-hepatic hematoma, which might be the single thing that prevents free venous rupture and as such, it should be avoided.  Venous balloon occlusion is a novel endovascular strategy that may be particularly advantageous in those circumstances as a bridging maneuver, for proximal and distal control, during hybrid repair. Our case in unique since it highlights the option of total endovascular treatment, using arterial treatment concepts, to treat this extremely challenging injury.    
静脉烟囱手术:一种预防肝后腔静脉损伤后医源性Budd - Chiari综合征的新技术解决方案
外伤性下腔静脉(IVC)病变约占腹腔血管损伤的25%,是创伤患者最具挑战性和致命性的病变之一。无论是钝性还是穿透性损伤,总死亡率高达92%;多达50%的这些损伤患者在到达医疗救治前死亡,在到达创伤中心的患者中,有生命迹象和/或接受手术治疗的死亡率在20%至57%之间(1)。肝后腔静脉(RHVC)损伤(RHVCI)极为罕见,因此治疗创伤的外科医生和血管外科医生都缺乏处理这种复杂损伤的必要经验。即使应用损害控制管理概念,继发于这些伤害的死亡率也非常高。改善这些损伤的结果仍然是现代创伤护理的一个重大挑战(2,3)。RHVCI的治疗面临着治疗外科医生的主要障碍,这些障碍来自RHVC在肝脏后部的解剖位置以及RHVC与肝脏之间丰富的桥静脉。这些解剖学上的障碍为接近受伤RHVC的近端和远端控制带来了重大的技术挑战。很多时候,为了获得适当的控制,腹部和胸部都需要暴露。一般的创伤,以及血管,外科医生不熟悉处理这种复杂的损伤。对于新一代血管外科医生来说更是如此,他们的开放血管手术经验,主要是在这种极端情况下,随着血管内技术使用的增加而减少(4)。血管内技术的进步为传统的开放修复策略引入了新的选择。在许多情况下,RHVCI治疗需要探查肝后血肿,这可能是防止自由静脉破裂的唯一原因,因此应该避免。静脉球囊闭塞是一种新的血管内策略,在混合修复过程中,作为近端和远端控制的桥接操作,在这些情况下可能特别有利。我们的病例是独特的,因为它强调了全血管内治疗的选择,使用动脉治疗的概念,来治疗这种极具挑战性的损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信