Effective communication management in a public health crisis: lessons learned about COVID-19 pandemic through the lens of health communication executives

IF 3.1 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Taylor S. Voges, Yan Jin, LaShonda L. Eaddy, Shelley Spector
{"title":"Effective communication management in a public health crisis: lessons learned about COVID-19 pandemic through the lens of health communication executives","authors":"Taylor S. Voges, Yan Jin, LaShonda L. Eaddy, Shelley Spector","doi":"10.1108/jcom-12-2021-0137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of the study is to provide insights on the COVID-19 pandemic communication from the lessons learned by health communication executives—how they perceived the COVID-19 pandemic and recommend preparing for communication management of future public health crises.Design/methodology/approachA number of top health communication executives in the United States, who worked in the healthcare industry for at least 25 years and held titles like director, president and chief strategist, were interviewed for their unique perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic. This study used the contingency theory of strategic conflict management for qualitative deductive analysis of the following segmentations of key factors that drove organizational communication management decision making during the pandemic: organization characteristics, relationship characteristics, general external climate, external publics and the issue under question.FindingsHealth communication executives heavily relied on their past health communication experiences, which led to nuanced understandings of the COVID-19 pandemic. Practically, the health communication executives urged future practitioners to constantly assess risks, hire and use diverse and representative decision-makers; set a communication protocol; and keep the communication in perspective. Theoretically, the contingency theory is furthered—there appears to be a theoretical linkage between the construct of general external climate and the construct of the external public.Originality/valueThe unique perspectives of top health communication executives, based in the United States, provided in-depth insights on the COVID-19 pandemic—its nuances, challenges and main influences (e.g. political, racial, etc.). These takeaways and recommendations can be adapted by other organizations and future health communicators in other parts of the world.","PeriodicalId":51660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-12-2021-0137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the study is to provide insights on the COVID-19 pandemic communication from the lessons learned by health communication executives—how they perceived the COVID-19 pandemic and recommend preparing for communication management of future public health crises.Design/methodology/approachA number of top health communication executives in the United States, who worked in the healthcare industry for at least 25 years and held titles like director, president and chief strategist, were interviewed for their unique perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic. This study used the contingency theory of strategic conflict management for qualitative deductive analysis of the following segmentations of key factors that drove organizational communication management decision making during the pandemic: organization characteristics, relationship characteristics, general external climate, external publics and the issue under question.FindingsHealth communication executives heavily relied on their past health communication experiences, which led to nuanced understandings of the COVID-19 pandemic. Practically, the health communication executives urged future practitioners to constantly assess risks, hire and use diverse and representative decision-makers; set a communication protocol; and keep the communication in perspective. Theoretically, the contingency theory is furthered—there appears to be a theoretical linkage between the construct of general external climate and the construct of the external public.Originality/valueThe unique perspectives of top health communication executives, based in the United States, provided in-depth insights on the COVID-19 pandemic—its nuances, challenges and main influences (e.g. political, racial, etc.). These takeaways and recommendations can be adapted by other organizations and future health communicators in other parts of the world.
公共卫生危机中的有效沟通管理:从健康沟通主管的角度了解新冠肺炎大流行的经验教训
目的本研究的目的是从卫生传播执行人员对新冠肺炎大流行的认识中获得关于COVID-19]大流行传播的经验教训,并建议为未来公共卫生危机的传播管理做好准备。设计/方法论/方法美国一些在医疗保健行业工作了至少25年并拥有董事、总裁和首席策略师等头衔的顶级健康传播高管接受了采访,以了解他们对新冠肺炎大流行的独特看法。本研究运用战略冲突管理的偶然性理论,对疫情期间推动组织沟通管理决策的关键因素进行了定性演绎分析:组织特征、关系特征、总体外部气候、外部公众和问题。FindingsHealth沟通主管在很大程度上依赖于他们过去的健康沟通经验,这导致了他们对新冠肺炎大流行的细微理解。实际上,健康传播主管敦促未来的从业者不断评估风险,雇佣和使用多样化和有代表性的决策者;设置通信协议;并保持正确的沟通。从理论上讲,偶然性理论得到了进一步的发展——一般外部气候的构建与外部公众的构建之间似乎存在着理论联系。原创/价值美国顶级健康传播高管的独特视角对新冠肺炎疫情的细微差别、挑战和主要影响(如政治、种族等)提供了深入的见解。这些观点和建议可以被世界其他地区的其他组织和未来的健康传播者所采纳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信