Partnerships and legal personality: cautionary tales from Scotland

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q1 LAW
L. Macgregor
{"title":"Partnerships and legal personality: cautionary tales from Scotland","authors":"L. Macgregor","doi":"10.1080/14735970.2019.1654805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article analyses the separate legal personality of partnerships, drawing on Hansmann and Kraakman's identification of the attributes shared by businesses possessing legal personality. Their work provides a jurisdictionally-neutral standard of comparison applied here to the Scottish partnership which, unusually amongst jurisdictions influenced by the common law tradition, possesses separate legal personality. The historical development of Scottish partnerships is explored, from its origins as a Roman-inspired type of societas, a contract centred on the rights and duties of the partners inter se, towards a modern, business able to contract with third parties in its own name. Scots law supports Hansmann and Kraakman's view that attributes of legal personality are secured by organisational law rather than contract law. Disagreeing with them, however, the author uses the Scottish experience to illustrate that lack of perpetual succession is not, as they argue, a ‘mere inconvenience which can easily overcome with contractual workarounds’, but rather an essential requirement of a workable partnership with legal personality.","PeriodicalId":44517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":"237 - 262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14735970.2019.1654805","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2019.1654805","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article analyses the separate legal personality of partnerships, drawing on Hansmann and Kraakman's identification of the attributes shared by businesses possessing legal personality. Their work provides a jurisdictionally-neutral standard of comparison applied here to the Scottish partnership which, unusually amongst jurisdictions influenced by the common law tradition, possesses separate legal personality. The historical development of Scottish partnerships is explored, from its origins as a Roman-inspired type of societas, a contract centred on the rights and duties of the partners inter se, towards a modern, business able to contract with third parties in its own name. Scots law supports Hansmann and Kraakman's view that attributes of legal personality are secured by organisational law rather than contract law. Disagreeing with them, however, the author uses the Scottish experience to illustrate that lack of perpetual succession is not, as they argue, a ‘mere inconvenience which can easily overcome with contractual workarounds’, but rather an essential requirement of a workable partnership with legal personality.
合伙企业和法人资格:来自苏格兰的警示故事
摘要本文借鉴Hansmann和Kraakman对具有法人资格的企业所共有的属性的认定,分析了合伙企业的独立法人资格。他们的工作提供了一个在司法管辖区中立的比较标准,适用于苏格兰合伙企业,在受普通法传统影响的司法管辖区中,这种合伙企业具有独立的法人资格,这是不寻常的。探讨了苏格兰合伙企业的历史发展,从其起源于一种受罗马启发的社会,一种以合伙人的权利和义务为中心的合同,到一种能够以自己的名义与第三方签订合同的现代企业。苏格兰法律支持Hansmann和Kraakman的观点,即法人资格的属性是由组织法而非合同法保障的。然而,与他们不同的是,作者利用苏格兰的经验来说明,正如他们所说,缺乏永久继承并不是“通过合同变通办法很容易克服的不便”,而是具有法人资格的可行合伙关系的基本要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信